module 6 assignment 5
I need help to get this algebra solve, I have down loaded and attached the assignment below. I will appreciate if you can solve it today? Thanks.
I need help to get this algebra solve, I have down loaded and attached the assignment below. I will appreciate if you can solve it today? Thanks.
Reflect on the assigned readings for Week 8 and then type a two page paper regarding what you thought was the most important concept(s), method(s), term(s), and/or any other thing that you felt was worthy of your understanding. Define and describe what you thought was worthy of your understanding in half a page, and then explain why you felt it was important, how you will use it, and/or how important it is in managerial economics. After submitting your two page paper as an initial post in the “Reflection and Discussion Forum,” then type at least two peer replies in response to your classmates posts (200 word minimum each).
Continuing review of written draft diss. Ensure that the proposal chapters 1,2,3 are amended per feedback.
Check the attached document for more info. Need the answer in 10 hours.
Required Research Paper Assignment Deliverables:
– Research Paper must be in APA Style
– Minimum of 10 pages
– Table of contents, clickable, auto-generated with Max of 3 levels deep-section headings
– Grammar, spelling, punctuation, and format should be correct and professional.
– Written assignment should be submitted in Word Doc format.
Lecture 1:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWMUukuVW9Q&feature=youtu.be
Lecture 2:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iT58SklRjVI&feature=youtu.be
In class reading see attached file.
Word count at least 350.
For response posts, you need to respond to a different critical thought post each week. Similar to the above information on critical thought posts, your response posts should be a well-composed response and reaction. The purpose and goal of your response is to extend your classmates’ thinking, to expand your classmates’ knowledge or understanding, to add to your classmate’s thoughts and analyses, to incorporate the new material we learn since the last discussion week, to address questions and offer perspective. In other words, it is about adding to the learning of your classmates and the class in general, and engaging in discussion. You will be graded on the quality of a review of new course material that relates to the discussion post, the inclusion of an answer to the questions asked, and the inclusion of a couple new questions to encourage continued discussion, the quality of those answers/questions, the inclusion of outside material (e.g. from other classes, from peer-reviewed journals, from life experience), how you made and the quality of the connections between lectures and readings, the illustration of critical thinking skills, and the inclusion of (proper) references and citations.
This is not a random internet blog site. This is not the place to insult or make fun of people even though you are friends. Please keep Netiquette in mind. I have a zero tolerance policy for disrespect and hate-speech.
Discussion board reminders:
Posted here is your voice. Posted here are the voices of students enrolled in Human Growth and Development. Please let each voice be heard. I encourage you to read through all critical thought posts within your assigned group, given that these are created by your peers for you specifically to read. You can always use the “like” button which is available in our Discussion Boards. Also, in order to see any post for the start of our Discussion board, you must first post yourself. This will challenge you to create your own unique critical thought post.
Discussion board grading rubric:
Here is a basic rubric for how we are grading each post. Please also consult the rubric provided in the syllabus:
Discussion was posted – 3 (note: late posts are not graded unless there is an approved UO accommodation)
Quality of review (see syllabus rubric)- 2
Questions (or answers) to engage others in a discussion- 1
Quality of those questions/answers- 1
Inclusion of outside material- 2
Connections between the lectures and the readings– 2
Critical thinking- 2
Inclusion of and accuracy of references and citations- 2
Must be at LEAST 200 words.
Often in science it is helpful to talk about a representative example of the objects or phenomena being studied. However, you must always keep in mind that the average case is not always representative. For example, our Sun is often described as an “average” star in the Milky Way. In what sense is this statement true? In what sense is this statement seriously misleading? Do you think it is useful to characterize the stars in the Milky Way by simply citing our “average” Sun?
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/sickaroun…
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/sickaroun…
As surveys are among the most popular forms of research published in criminology, it is valuable to explore the quality of surveys as a research method. How survey questions are drafted can have a great impact on the quality and accuracy of your findings. Open-ended questions do not enforce explicit response options, whereas fixed-choice questions only allow for a list exhaustive and mutually exclusive responses. It is important to write clear and meaningful questions and avoid confusing phrasing or vagueness. Researchers should also avoid negatives and double-negatives, double-barreled questions, and favoring agreement or disagreement for clarity’s sake. Certain trade-offs and compromises must often be made between research goals, such as achieving measurement reliability and validity, generalizability, and cost-effectiveness including the decision to use open- or closed-ended questions.
In this discussion, you will explore the trade-off of whether to use open- or closed-ended questions in survey research. For this discussion, address the following in your main post:
Compensation Paper- 3pgs- Domestic and international organizations
Compensation may be the most important aspect of one’s employment, and this remains so whether you are a domestic or international employee. However, in compensation we know that “one size does not fit all†and compensation must be tailored to each person and assignment. This becomes even more important when addressing global compensation. With that as a background, complete the following:
3-4 pages, references.
First, make sure you are good at Theatre and Drama area before you take this work, here are the detailed requirements:
Directors seem to be the person “in charge” of a play’s production. However, leadership styles vary greatly from person to person. See what your opinion is:
What qualities do you think the director of a play should have? Do you possess any of these qualities? Do you think you could/would be an effective director? Why or why not?
OR
Reality TV- Yes, they still have a director behind that camera telling you a story.
What reality shows do you love? Why or Why not?
Here are the detailed requirements. I have also uploaded the textbook for you to have the referance if you need. This work is very important to me, so high quality must be ensured. Looking forward to your high quality work! Thank you!