kellyanne conway 200 words

by

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-7fzHy3aG0

Describe how Kellyanne Conway deals with questions.

Express some substantive thoughts regarding the videos of Kellyanne Conway.

writing assignment 5 civilization

by

How different was France in 1815 from 1789? What did the events of the French Revolution and Napoleon’s rule accomplish that either benefited or harmed the French people?

o Requirements: 250 words minimum; APA formatting; Address at least two of the readings from the Perry reader in your response.

Perry, M. (2018). Sources of the Western tradition: From the Renaissance to the present (10th ed., Vol. 2). Boston, MA: Wadsworth.

the question and detail is below 55

by

Health Maintenance and Screening Plans

Clinical preventive services, such as routine disease screening and scheduled immunizations, are key to reducing death and disability and improving the Nation’s health. Yet, despite the fact that these services are covered by Medicare, Medicaid, and many private insurance plans under the Affordable Care Act, millions of children, adolescents, and adults go without clinical preventive services that could protect them from developing a number of serious diseases or help them treat certain health conditions before they worsen.

Discuss preventative services and ways to promote and overcome the barriers in your clinical practice to deliver holistic care including the recommended services for all patients across a lifespan. Please include examples, evidence-based

information
 and references to support your work.

To view the Grading Rubric for this Assignment, please visit the Grading Rubrics section of the Course Resources.

Assignment Requirements:

Before finalizing your work, you should:

  • be sure to read the Assignment description carefully (as displayed above);
  • consult the Grading Rubric (under the Course Resources) to make sure you have included everything necessary; and
  • Utilize spelling and grammar check to minimize errors.

Your

writing
 Assignment should:

  • follow the conventions of Standard English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.);
  • be

    well ordered
    , logical, and unified, as well as original and insightful;
  • display superior content, organization, style, and mechanics; and
  • use APA 6th Edition format as outlined in the APA Progression Ladder.

How to Submit:

assignment 1959

by

Learn About Defending Against DDoS

Using WORD, write an ORIGINAL brief essay of 300 words or more:

  • Find a DoS attack that has occurred in the last six months
  • You might find some resources at www.f-secure.com.
  • Note how that attack was conducted.
  • Write a brief explanation of how you might have defended against that specific attack.

excel 3 practical

by

EXCEL PRACTICAL EXERCISE – 3 Formulas and Charting

Instructions:

is microsoft central or decentral

by

Central or Decentral?

Each week, you will be asked to respond to the prompt or prompts in the discussion forum. Your initial post should be 300+ words in length, and is due on Sunday. By Tuesday, you should respond to two additional posts from your peers.

There are two basic overall shapes that an organizational structure can assume: centralized or decentralized. Each organization is unique and can demonstrate some characteristics of both, but most organizations tend to fall more toward one type or the other.

First, read Chapter 14 in the text.

Next, please watch the following video clip from the lab:

  • Chapter 14: Concept Clip: Centralized Vs. Decentralized Control

Research the company (Microsoft) you have chosen for your final project and do your best to determine the current structure of the company (centralized or decentralized). Share current resource (less than 8 weeks old) and examples to support why you chose centralized or decentralized. If you were leading the company, would you leave the structure as-is? Why or why not?

Grading Rubric (The discussion grading rubric explains expectations and will be used to evaluate your contribution based on the quality of work in your initial posts and replies. A total of 50 points are possible, distributed among the three criteria listed below.)

Criteria

Far Exceeds Expecations

Exceeds Expectations

Meets Expectations

Partially Meets Expectations

Does Not Meet Expectations

Application and Content. (Apply critical thinking and analysis to demonstrate an understanding of lesson topics.)

18 – 20 points

– Thoroughly answered the discussion question(s) and replied with clear, well-developed, and meaningful thoughts.

– All critical points were addressed individually and supported by evidence of having read the assigned course readings and applying the majority of the basic concepts in the initial post.

– Relevant ideas or practical experiences are used to emphasize the understanding of the discussion topic(s).

16 – 17 points

– Answered the discussion question(s) and replied with clear, well-developed, and meaningful thoughts.

– Most critical points were addressed individually and supported by evidence of having read the assigned course reading sand applying some of the basic concepts in the initial post.

– Relevant ideas or practical experiences are used to emphasize understanding of the discussion topic(s).

14 – 15 points

– Answered most of the discussion question(s), but not fully developed to demonstrate strong analytical and critical thinking skills.

– Some critical points were addressed individually, but not supported by evidence of having read the assigned course readings and applying basic concepts in the initial post.

– Relevant ideas or practical experiences were absent or limited.

12 – 13 points

– Partially answered the discussion question(s) by identifying the main topic(s), but lacked elements of critical thinking and analysis.

– The points addressed were not clear or well-developed.

– Relevant ideas or practical experience(s) were not provided.

– Evidence of having read the assigned course readings was not clearly demonstrated.

0 – 11 points

– Insufficiently answered the discussion question(s).

– The points addressed inadequately addressed the topic.

– Relevant ideas and practical experience(s) were not provided.

– The points discussed lacked evidence of having read the assigned course readings.

Engagement and Participation. (Encourage further discussion from peers and provide meaningful contribution on the topic. Participate in a respectful manner, with appropriate length and punctuality.)

18 – 20 points

– Engaged in the discussion forum by offering extended or in-depth posts and generating relevant conversations and questions among peers.

– Participated multiple days throughout the week. Met deadlines, and exceeded the participation guidelines.

16 – 17 points

– Engaged in the discussion forum by offering substantive posts and generating relevant conversations or questions among peers.

– Participated multiple days throughout the week. Met deadlines and exceeded the participation guidelines.

14 – 15 points

– Engaged in the discussion forum by offering satisfactory posts, but did not promote further conversations or questions among peers.

– Participated multiple days throughout the week. Met deadlines and the participation guidelines.

12 – 13 points

– Engagement was lacking in the discussion forum. The posts did not generate relevant conversations or questions among the peers.

– Participated multiple times during the week, but did not meet the deadlines or participation guidelines.

0 – 11 points

– The posts were not engaging, and prevented others from participating in a discussion that added value to the forum.

– Participated at least once during the week, but did not meet the deadlines and participation guidelines.

Clarity and Organization. (Present well-reasoned, organized, and structured ideas, with an appropriate use of writing style.)

9 – 10 points

– Paragraphs and sentences are well-developed, properly formatted, and contain a strong topic sentence.

– All arguments and point(s) presented are consistent, clear, and concise.

– Exceptional use of grammar, and free of spelling, punctuation, or other mechanical errors.

– All references used are identified by proper in-text citations and are listed at the bottom of the post(s).

8 points

– Paragraphs are well-developed, properly formatted, and include a topic sentence.

– Most arguments and point(s) presented are consistent, clear, and concise.

– Outstanding use of grammar, and free of spelling, punctuation, or other mechanical errors.

– Most references used are identified by proper in-text citations and are listed at the bottom of the post(s).

7 points

– Paragraphs are adequately developed, but lack a topic sentence.

– Insufficient clarity and inconsistencies are present in argument(s) and post(s).

– Adequate use of grammar with minimal spelling, punctuation, or other mechanical errors.

– References used are identified and are listed at the bottom of the post(s).

6 points

– Paragraphs and sentences are underdeveloped and disorganized.

– It is difficult to determine the argument(s) and point(s) being presented.

– Inadequate use of grammar, and frequent spelling, punctuation and other mechanical errors.

– References used are not identified or listed at the bottom of the post(s).

assignment 1 review qualitative article critique

by

Instructions

Qualitative Research Critique

Goals for the assignment is to:

  1. Use criteria for critiquing a qualitative or a quantitative research report.
  2. Evaluate the strengths, weaknesses, and applicability of research.
  3. Use research critique methodology to guide evidence-based practice.

Directions

  1. Using the criteria in each of the guidelines to assist you, evaluate the study
  2. Summarize your findings using substantive information from the article to support the claim you are making about the critique.
  3. Submit the following for grading in hard copy
  • Research articles
  • Paper
  • Rating scale (includes comments section) – see attached document

4. Submit utilizing correct grammar, APA format and citations are expected. Cover sheet, reference page in APA style is required.

Assignment File(s)

Type of research

QUALITATIVE RESEARCH CRITIQUE CRITERIA

Goals for the assignment is to:

a.Use criteria for critiquing a qualitative or a quantitative research report.

b.Evaluate the strengths, weaknesses, and applicability of research.

c.Use research critique methodology to guide evidence-based practice.

Additional Directions:

  1. Using the criteria in each of the guidelines to assist you, evaluate the study
  2. Summarize your findings using substantive information from the article to support the claim you are making about the critique.
  3. Submit the following for grading in hard copy

a.Research articles

b.Paper

c.Rating scale (includes comments section)

  1. Submit utilizing correct grammar, APA format and citations are expected. Cover sheet, reference page in APA style is required.

Qualitative Study Critique Rubric

It is not enough to indicate that the component is met. Detailed and concise explanations based on the article must be included. Each section in the Research Critique Guide must be included in your critique.

Elements influencing the believability of the research

Title

ØIs the title clear, accurate, and unambiguous

Abstract

ØDoes the abstract offer a clear overview of the study include the research problem sample, methodology, finding and recommendations?

Elements influencing the robustness of the research

Phenomenon of interest

ØWhat is the phenomenon of interest, and is it clearly stated?

ØWhat is the justification for using a qualitative method?

ØWhat are the philosophic underpinnings of the research method?

Purpose/ Significance of Study

ØWhat is the purpose of the study?

ØWhat is the possible significance of the work to nursing?

Review of Literature

ØHas a literature review been undertaken?

ØDoes it meet the philosophical underpinnings of the study?

ØDoes the review of the literature fulfill its objectives?

ØWere a majority of the sources from primary methods?

Method

ØIs the method used to collect data compatible with the purpose of the research?

ØIs the method adequate to address the phenomenon of interest?

ØWas there a particular approach that was used to guide the research? If so, does the researcher complete the study according to the process described?

Sample

ØIs the sampling method and sample size identified?

ØWas it convenience or purposive sampling?

ØIs the sampling method appropriate?

ØAre the participants who were chosen appropriate to inform the research?

ØWere the demographics of the participants described?

Ethical Considerations

ØWere the participants fully informed about the nature of the research?

ØWas the anonymous/ confidentiality of the participants guaranteed?

ØWere the participants protected from harm?

ØWas ethical permission granted for the study?

Data collection

ØAre data focused on human experience?

ØDoes the researcher describe data collection strategies (e.g., interview, observation, field notes)?

ØIs protection of participants addressed?

ØIs saturation of the data described?

Data analysis

ØWhat strategy (ies) are used to analyze data?

ØAre steps described for data analysis followed?

ØIf there was a research team, was the data analysis initially conducted independently?

ØWere outside experts consulted in the data analysis process?

ØWere participants consulted on the interpretation of the data?

ØDoes the researcher discuss how rigor was assured?

ØCredibility

ØDo the participants recognize the experience as their own?

ØHas adequate time been allowed to understand the phenomenon fully?

ØAuditability

ØCan the reader follow the researcher’s reasoning?

ØDoes the researcher document the research process?

ØFittingness of the data

ØAre the findings applicable outside of the study situation?

ØAre the results meaningful to individuals not involved in the research?

ØIs the strategy used for the analysis compatible with the purpose of the study?

Findings

ØAre the findings presented within a context?

ØIs the reader able to comprehend the “essence of the experience” from the report?

ØAre the researcher’s conceptualizations (themes) true to the data?

ØDoes the researcher place the report in the context of what is already known?

ØWas the existing literature on the topic related to the findings?

Conclusions, implications, and recommendations

ØDo the conclusions, implications, and recommendations give a context to use the findings?

ØDo the conclusions reflect the study findings?

ØWhat are the recommendations for future study?

ØDo they reflect the findings?

ØHow has the researcher made explicit the significance to nursing theory, research, or practice?

References

ØWere all the books, journals, and other media alluded to in the study accurately references?

These final two sections should not have headings of their own, but the information should be input into your critique in the introduction or the conclusion of your paper.

Writing style

ØIs the article well-written, concise, grammatically correct, avoid use of jargon?

ØIs it well laid out and organized?

Logical consistency

ØDoes the research report follow the steps of the research process in a logical manner?

ØDo these steps naturally flow and are the links clear.

Adopted from Yang, Y. (n.d.). Qualitative research article critique guidelines. Retrieve from http://edci6300introresearch.pbworks.com/f/Research+Article+Critique+Guidelines-Qualitative.pdf

homework in r language 5

by

I have a basic homework is needed to be solved in R. The questions are attached but the data will be provided when accepting the question.

nestle child labor

by

Just elaborate the key story of the paper (the first part). I have uploaded the paper. Just work on the key story to empasize

i need help writing the admissions essay needs to be 200 words

by

Here at USD, we believe that our campus community and the communities we engage with are integral parts of who we are as a university. Our students come from all walks of life, have experienced very different realities and bring with them an array of unique perspectives. Some of these perspectives are underrepresented and underserved by higher education. What contribution have you made to your high school and/or local community that best exemplifies your awareness and commitment to creating a diverse and equitable community?

I’m an international student, I cam to America when I was 17 I didn’t know anyone so I started to go out with other international students from my ESL class and it opened my eyes to all deferent types of cultures.