literature poetry writing 03

This week, we’ll be doing a couple things:

1. Making a brief excursion into the world of poetry.

Here is the Norton reading link: https://b-ok.cc/book/3409266/1950b1

[ ] Read the introduction to poetry in your Norton (see link). Please read at least the first five pages (476- the top of 481), though I’d recommend the whole introduction (476-501).

[ ] I’ll be posting a brief video on poetry as well.

[ ] Then, looking through the entire table of contents, please choose 5 poems to read on your own. (Poetry is found all the way from 476-749.) I would recommend several, but on the other hand, poetry, like music, ought to be found by love– so spend some time. You won’t regret it. (And on the other hand, if you’d like me to tell you about some of my favorites, watch the video. I’ll probably mention some. 🙂

2. Writing a Literary Critique.

For this paper, you’ll be taking part in the craft of the literary critic. By “criticism” we do not mean, of course, “saying negative things” (necessarily).

For this paper, you may pick any work– fiction, poetry, or drama– in our Norton book on which to write.

When you write a literary critique, what you’re doing is saying “This is what I think this story/poem/play is doing. This is what I think it means. And here is why…” You then proceed to back up your claim with examples from the text. You might also provide an evaluation of the quality of the work in regard to how well it accomplishes its task.

For this paper, you’ll be performing a very short (2-3 page) literary critique. Make sure you’ve read over the “What makes a good literature paper?” source (found under Week 5, Scholarly Links), as well as the rubric.

i need help writing this paper it has to be 5 pages long and 2500 words single spaced

For this assignment, I want you to identify a scientific article and analyze the various arguments presented within. Often, focusing on a scientific controversy provides a fun and interesting topic for this analysis, but you don’t have to choose an article associated with a controversy. Examples of controversies include: the cathode ray, cause for dinosaur extinction, steady-state vs big bang theory for the origin of the universe, expanding earth vs plate tectonic model, etc. What’s most important here is that you analyze how the author of the text you select portrays science.

Let the following questions guide your analysis:

  1. What is the article about? Who is it intended for?
  2. How does the author portray science? Is it blackboxed and therefore only focuses on the conclusions? Why does the author need to frame science as they have?
  3. What rhetorical practices are at play throughout the article? What function do they serve?
  4. Do these rhetorical practices work? Why or why not? (Use the audience and context of the article as foundations for building your argument)

optimal capital structure 1

Write a 750 – 1000 word paper. In your paper include the following:

  • Explain the capital structure of Lowe’s. Do they rely more heavily on debt or equity? What are their structure weights (%’s)? How does this structure contribute to the overall risk of Lowe’s? Do you feel they have chosen an ideal capital structure? What would you do to improve their structure if you could be CEO for a day?

Includee a title page and 3-5 references. Only one reference may be from the internet

mgt423 discussion

Sandra Janoff and Marvin Weisbord are the original developers of the Future Search method and are the founders of the Future Search Network. Corporations pay a lot of money for their services, but fortunately they have a few videos up on YouTube so you can get a taste of what kind of material they go through when giving a seminar. Find some videos from one or both of them and share the link to the video that you find the most useful.

owen-open space technologyHarrison Owen is the developer of Open Space Technology. He also has a few videos up on YouTube as well. Take a look at some of his videos and share the link to one that you found to be the most useful.

Answer the following questions concerning the videos on Future Search and Open Space:

  1. Did the videos help you understand any of the concepts from the background readings? Be specific as to what concepts were covered in the videos that were also covered in the readings.
  2. Was the video well organized and presented? Based on the video, are you surprised that Weisbord, Janoff, and Owen are successful consultants?

write a white paper 3 5 pages and make ppp to present paper

Prepare a white paper on:

  • Policies regarding police use of aerial drones for surveillance operations

A white paper is an authoritative report or guide informing readers in a concise manner about a complex issue and presenting the issuing body’s philosophy on the matter. It is meant to help readers understand an issue, solve a problem, or make a decision.

For additional information regarding the White Paper, visit https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/546/1/ (Links to an external site.) White Paper: Purpose and Audience

WHITE PAPER:

Length: 3-5 pages
Content: Follow APA style
Sources: Must include not less than 5 scholarly sources, reliable sources only, original work only

The following policy topic must be used for the white paper and presentation.

  • Policies regarding police use of aerial drones for surveillance operations

Presentation:

Upon completion of the white paper, prepare a short power point presentation to present the white paper. The presentation should include no more than 10 slides no less than 5.

The following rubric will be used to assess the white paper assignment and the slide presentation, please meet requirement from the rubric.

White Paper and Presentation Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Points

Ideas/Content (Development)

The writing is clearly focused which leads to achieving a well-defined goal. The purpose is clearly defined. The writing supports the purpose with concise, logical details that meet the reader’s informational needs. Sources, if used, are acknowledged.

21 – 30 pts

The writing addresses an identifiable goal by offering the reader general basic information. The development is limited, sketchy, and/or general. The purpose can be identified. The writing sometimes supports the purpose with concise, logical details that meet the reader’s informational needs. Sources, if used, are sometimes acknowledged.

11 – 20 pts

The writing needs a clarified goal as the text has no clear sense of purpose. The purpose needs to be better identified. The student does not support the purpose with concise, logical details that meet the answer/response requirements. Sources, if used, were not properly acknowledged.

0 – 10 pts

30

Sentence Structure (Mechanics)

The text flows easily with a variety of sentence structures and lengths. Compact sentences or phrases make the point clear. The text reflects logic and sense and helps show how ideas relate.

21 – 30 pts

The text flows efficiently but lacks variety in sentence structure. Sometimes compact sentences or phrases make the point clear but some sentences are wordy. The text reflects logic and sense and helps show how some ideas relate. Fragments, if used, distract from the flow of the text.

11 – 20 pts

The text uses sentences that tend to be choppy, incomplete, rambling, or awkward. The text is difficult to follow. Wordy sentences detract from the purpose. The text tends to obscure meaning, rather than showing the reader how ideas relate.

0 – 10 pts

30

Grammar/Spelling and word usage

The writer demonstrates control of standard writing conventions and uses them effectively to enhance readability. Errors tend to be so few and minor the reader can easily skim right over them. Paragraph division is sound and reinforces the organizational structure. Grammar and usage are correct and contribute to clarity and style. Punctuation is smooth and guides the reader through the text. Spelling is generally correct even on more difficult words. Only light editing would be required to polish the text for publication. Graphic devices, when used, are clear, helpful, visually appealing and supportive of the text.

21 – 30 pts

Errors in spelling, punctuation, usage and grammar, capitalization, and/or paragraphing repeatedly distract the reader and make the text difficult to read. The reader must read once to decode, then again for meaning. Paragraph divisions are missing, irregular, or so frequent (e.g. every sentence) that it does not relate to the organization of the text. Errors in grammar and usage are very noticeable and may affect meaning. Punctuation is often missing or incorrect. Spelling errors are frequent even on common words. Extensive editing would be required to polish the text for publication. Graphic devices, when used, are not clear, helpful, visually appealing or supportive of the text.

11 – 20 pts

The writer shows reasonable control over a limited range of standard writing conventions. Errors are numerous or serious enough to be somewhat distracting, but the writer handles some conventions well. Paragraph divisions are attempted but paragraphs sometimes run together or begin in the wrong places. Problems with grammar and usage are not serious enough to distort meaning. Terminal (end-of-sentence) punctuation is almost always correct; internal punctuation (commas, apostrophes, semicolons) may be incorrect or missing. Spelling is usually correct on common words. Moderate editing would be required to polish the text for publication. Graphic devices, when used, are sometimes clear, helpful, visually appealing and supportive of the text.

0 – 10 pts

30

Content

Clear, concise description of what was found and how it was found. Results are presented in an easy to understand way with only the necessary pieces of information presented. Results are interpreted and linked back to the problem at hand. Tables and figures are easy to understand.

21 – 30 pts

Very little description of what was found or far too much extraneous information presented. Summary tables and/or results are difficult to read and/or understand. Presentation of results is incomplete and there is no organization. No interpretation of the results relative to the problem is given.

11 – 20 pts

Description of the analysis is mostly clear but it too brief or too long. Presentation of results is choppy making it hard to follow. Little interpretation of results is done. Tables and figures can be understood.

0 – 10 pts

30
Presentation

The main ideas were presented in and concise, orderly, and clear manner The presentation filled the time allotted The slides were appropriate and supported the presentation The presenter stayed on topic and maintained the audience interest The presenter was responsive to audience questions.

17 – 24 pts

The main ideas were unclear The presentation exceed the time allotted, or filled less than 75% The slides were incongruous with the presentation The presenter did not stayed on topic or maintain the audience interest The presenter was not responsive to audience questions.

10 – 16 pts

The main ideas presented in and generally orderly manner The presentation fill more the 75% of the time allotted Most of the slides were appropriate and supported the presentation The presenter generally stayed on topic and maintained the audience interest The presenter was responsive to audience questions.

0 – 9 pts

24

TOTAL

144

assignment 1962

Implementation Plan for Improving Employee Satisfaction

This Assignment will be part of the Final Project’s “Recommendation Report of Workplace Motivation Best Practices for Your Organization” that you will turn in at the end of Unit 9. In light of the fact that this Assignment will be part of your Final Project and should represent the very best of your writing, the project has been designed to be completed in portions to permit feedback and revision.

The Assignment for this unit is for you to develop and create a plan for improving employee satisfaction based upon employee satisfaction data; the Unit 7 Assignment will be to develop and create a plan for improving work life quality in a cost effective way; and the Final Project in Unit 9 will incorporate revisions of both of these earlier Assignments as well as an abstract.

As noted, this Assignment represents portions of your Final Project. It will be written as a standard paper, with title and references page. When it is revised for inclusion in your Final Project, some changes will need to be made, but if you have done well here, those changes will be obvious and minor.

The Introduction section of an Implementation Plan includes: 1). an explanation of the topic, 2). a literature review of previously published research on the topic of improving employee satisfaction using employee satisfaction data, and 3). a description of the proposed implementation plan.

Open the Introduction section with an introductory paragraph complete with a thesis statement, just like any paper. From there, move into a discussion of the plan for improving employee satisfaction using employee satisfaction data: describe the plan and the issues around it; define terms that might not be known by the reader. Make sure that your readers understand the approach contained within your plan.

Once the reader understands the planned approach, move smoothly into a literature review discussing recent research on the topic (using the 3–5 articles you found while doing the Unit 2 Discussions and Assignment). Describe the approach and method in each research paper, and critique the methods used and the conclusions that were drawn. Was the research done well? Are the conclusions that were drawn sound? Did they miss anything? What application does the research have to your planned approach for improving employee satisfaction based upon employee satisfaction data?

After the literature review, transition into a discussion of your proposed approach for improving employee satisfaction. Explain how you will do this using the employee satisfaction data reviewed. Describe the approach and practices used for the implementation of your plan.

Finally, write a summary paragraph that recaps the plan, the approach and practices, and what the proposed Implementation Plan hopes to accomplish.

As noted, this Assignment represents portions of your Final Project. It should have a title page and references page and should be formatted according to the APA Publication Manual’s outline for a Method section (see page 44 of the APA Publication Manual for a graphic and description of the formatting). When it is revised for inclusion in the Final Project, some changes will need to be made, but if you have done well here, those changes will be minor.

The Method section of an Implementation Plan is like the instructions portion of a recipe. It outlines in very specific terms everything that is necessary to cook the dish (to perform the work in the plan). This includes describing the ingredients in very specific detail (describing the participants and how they are involved, describing any apparatus or other materials necessary for the implementation) and then giving very detailed instructions on how to make the dish (the procedure…how one will perform the plan). As with any other recipe, if anything is vague or left out of the description, the result will not be what was intended.

The Method section for the Implementation in this course assignment will have five subsections, arranged in this order: Participants, Apparatus/Materials, Measures, Procedure, and Ethical Considerations. Apart from these subsections, there should be no other material in the Method section.

Under “Participants,” the target participants should be clearly described along with the method of selection and the rationale for why that method will be used. Also include how the actual invitation and/or how the recruitment will be done.

“Apparatus/Materials” will describe any equipment or other materials that will be needed. If you intend to use a questionnaire or inventory as part of your employee data collection, it should be clearly identified here.

The “Measures” subsection describes the variables being considered in the study. Describe the independent and dependent variables (if applicable), how they will be analyzed, and how you will assess the reliability and validity of the measures. Be sure to describe how your measures will be used in your plan for improving employee satisfaction based upon employee satisfaction data.

The “Procedure” subsection must be completed in enough detail to ensure that someone else reading it could replicate your project exactly as proposed. Referring back to the recipe metaphor: If the recipe does not clearly and exactly describe every step, each person using the recipe is likely to wind up with a very different food dish at the end. The procedure section should also clearly indicate (if applicable) what type of experimental design is being used (e.g., quantitative, quasi-experiment design).

The final subsection, “Ethical Considerations” will discuss appropriate ethical issues that might arise from implementing the project: informed consent, privacy issues, confidentiality, etc. Do not simply give a “laundry list” of the APA standards; discuss them in terms of your Implementation Plan and how you will ensure that you are in accordance with the guidelines.

Assignment Directions

To recap in an outline format:

  1. Formal title page (this title page will not be included in the Final Project)
  2. Introduction and Literature Review
  3. Method section
    1. Participants subsection (describing targeted population to be involved, describing the recruitment and selection plan)
    2. Materials subsection (describing all equipment and materials needed including questionnaire and other data-gathering tools)
    3. Measures subsection (describing variables to be controlled/measured, discussion of reliability and validity, and how the measures will be used within the project)
    4. Procedure subsection (detailed description of how the employee satisfaction approach will be implemented, in sufficient detail to permit replication. Clearly label any research design)
    5. Ethical considerations subsection (discuss APA ethical guidelines with respect to how they must be implemented for the project.)
  4. References (materials from this page and the Unit 7 Assignment’s references page will be consolidated in the Final Project)

Length: 5–8 pages.

The Assignment should:

  • Follow Assignment directions (review grading rubric for best results).
  • Use correct APA formatting per the APA Publication Manual, 6th Edition.
  • Demonstrate college-level communication through the composition of original materials in Standard American English.
  • Be written in Standard American English and be clear, specific, and error-free. If needed, be sure to use the Writing Center for help.

complete medical terminology quiz and discussion dex

Login and complete the Medical Terminology Quiz and then Post the Initial Discussion for Unit I and reply to two students

I really need an A on the quiz PLEASE

I will provide login details

answer and analyze a reading

Write an executive summary and answer these questions.Do not include the actual questions in the writing.

  1. What factors should Mr.Weir consider in dealing whether to adopt level production
  2. What are the total savings from adopting level production
  3. Prepare pro forma income statements, balance sheets to estimate the amount of funds required and the timing of the needs under level production. Does Polar need more than $4 million to finance level production? Why or why not?
  4. Compare the liability patterns feasible under the alternative production plans. What implications do their differences have for the risk assumed by the various parties?
  5. What would be the impact of the unsold inventory on cash lows and projects cash savings?

For all these questions analysis the numbers and write on it as well.

how could your personal values and personal model of servant leadership influence individual and group behavior

Write a paper of 1,250-1,500 words that presents your complete personal model of leadership. Be sure to incorporate the instructor’s feedback from the draft of Part 1. The two parts involved in creating your personal model of leadership are as follows:

  1. Select values from the “Rokeach Values Survey” that will provide the foundation of your model and discuss the leadership behaviors that will result from those values. Be sure to select values for all four of the levels: individual, interpersonal, organizational, and societal. Be sure to incorporate the feedback from your instructor from your previous draft.
  2. How could your personal values and personal model of servant leadership influence individual and group behavior?
  3. How could your personal values and personal model of servant leadership positively influence organizations and society?
  4. How do servant leadership principles in accordance with the Christian World View, interact with essential management practices and how does servant leadership influence individual, group, and organizational behavior?

number 1 is what you have already worked with me on,

psychoanalysis and neo psychoanalysis and analytic psychology

Psychoanalysis, Neo-Psychoanalysis and Analytic Psychology: Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders

Clusters A & B Personality Disorders

1.* Sigmund Freud

2.*Anna Freud

3.* Carl Jung

4.*Erick Erickson

5.*Karen Horney

6.*Harry S. Sullivan

Paper and Journal Article critique, both should be seperate. The papper should be APA format, 12 font roman with runing head and page number. The paper should be 5 pages and a seperate page for refrences.