Please write this into my own words. I just don’t want to write it out on my own. Please do this for me

Read all of the following:

• Trifles/”A Jury of her Peers”

Please follow these directions carefully! You will need to write about at least two of the readings, if not all of them.

• For your initial post, respond to one thread below. It must be at least 200 words and refer to at least 2 pieces of evidence from the text (plot points, thoughts, actions…)– use direct quotes.
• You need to post 3 responses total to peers. You can jump across threads, discussing any of these works! Each response must be at least 150 words.
• Responses need to include evidence from the text and refer to literary terms.
• If you forget to refer to at least 2 works within your responses, you will only earn half-credit overall.

Use only Trifles/”A Jury of her Peers” for this thread.

• Do you think Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters were justified in their actions at the end of the play?
• Use evidence from the text– specifically characterization. Include at least 2 direct quotes to illustrate this.
• When responding to peers, include evidence from the text as your support.

Grading rubric

Level 5 – Meets all standards

100 %

Level 4 – Meets most standards

85 %

Level 3 – Meets some standards

70 %

Level 2 – Meets few standards

50 %

Level 1 – Does not meet standards

0 %

Response states a premise up front, supports it with specific examples and references to readings/texts, explains the importance of these references, and closes with a strong clarifying statement.

Premise may need clarity, OR may need more support OR explanation of support; closing statement needed

Missing premise AND specific support; conclusion may need work

Missing premise; support not thoroughly developed; conclusion needs work

Missing premise, support, and conclusions

/ 100

This assignment asks you to create an annotated bibliography of secondary sources for your capstone research project. Your bibliography should include 8-10 secondary sources, all published since 1995. Of these sources, a minimum of 5 must be historical monographs and a minimum of 3 must be scholarly journal articles (not book reviews).

Using Chicago Manual of Style. size 12 times new roman

Please follow the attached guidelines

please watch the three videos below and write a three to four paragraphs summarizing the contents of the videos. the paragraphs do not have to correlate with each other nor need to be in a specif format, just summarize what the videos are saying. Thank you.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z1n2bX_VkuM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rap9zd6JT0A

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jf9GmiWLWBE&list=PLxP0KZzCGFYP0KHkWvqCF03vAQKygcLFc

Select an online article that relates to ethical decision making/CSR and complete the discussion below. Must provide link to article.

It does not need to be double spaced or need a certain word count. This is just a discussion

Post your article in this discussion. The following guidelines apply:

• The article must be dated within the last six months, preferably within the last month or two.
• Provide a hyperlink to the article, publication information, a brief synopsis, and explanation of how the article relates to ethical decision making/CSR.