it is just a 100 word reply with at least one reference

by

Frederick has been placed in a difficult situation from his professor’s doing. As he confided in them to talk about his idea, they betrayed his trust and went on to make a business out of it. As the lawyer that he has received advising from has told him to file a lawsuit right away, I believe that Frederick should reassess his case in order to make sure that he has all of his facts together.

When it comes to filing a lawsuit, it is important that you observe contract information, performance, breach, and damages; these key legal elements help to identify if the contractor agreed either orally or in writing. For Frederick’s case, I would look at the damages due to no form of writing for the contract. according to the article, “When Should You Sue?”, Damages “must show that you suffered an economic loss as a result of the other party’s breach of contract” (2012). Since the business that he plans to inventis said to absolutely revolutionize the market and will make him very rich, Frederick will, therefore, have an economic loss. If he would want to file a lawsuit, his proof of the invention being his idea would be the project that he has previously completed. As for a good case, FindLaw’s team says, “To ensure you have a “good case”, you, the plaintiff, will need to go down this checklist of elements and make sure that you can satisfy or prove each one” (2016). With Frederick not having a complete full checklist complete, I would find evidence on his side to prove that he had the idea of the invention before the professors in order to have a strong case.

From my own biblical standpoint, I do not believe that it is necessary to always resort to suing. Proverbs 25:7-8 states “What you have seen with your eyes, do not bring hastily to court, for what will you do in the end if your neighbor puts you to shame?” This Bible verse gives a good insight into how you should go about filing a lawsuit. If the problem lies directly with a betrayal of trust, it is best to consider that neighbor because if you then betray another’s trust, they may then charge against you. Overall, my advice for Frederick would be to gather and asses all of your counter information so that he has a built case to prove that the idea what his invention first. If there is not much evidence to support his claim, then I would advise him to come to an agreement with the professors in order to become a main part of the business.

i need help with my homework 184

by

BCJ 3601 Unit V Discussion Board:

Click the link to read theUnitV_Handout.pdf and answer the questions below.

Should Linda’s police record be admitted into evidence? May Paul be convicted of rape? Would your answer be different if Paul had gotten Linda intoxicated?

PS 1020 Unit V Discussion Board:

Can you think of a situation where the individual rights of an accused criminal should be considered above the individual rights of his or her victim? Is it acceptable for law enforcement to bypass the law, such as entering a suspect’s private property without a search warrant when they know someone is guilty? What protection does the judicial system provide?

operation management 104

by

1.Finish midterm Exam.

2.write a discussion about

“The world’s largest retailer, Walmart, owns and manages its own fleet of trucks. The company has often received praise for its distribution capabilities. The practice, however, seems to represent a stark contrast to the practice of outsourcing not only shipping, but other logistics operations to third-party logistics providers. Please address the advantages and disadvantages of these different policies. Under what conditions would it make sense for a firm to own and manage its own trucking operation?”

discussion questions 4 1

by

Discussion Questions

For class periods designated “DQ” in the course schedule, each student will provide two discussion questions based on the reading(s) listed on the course schedule for that date. If two readings are assigned, you should write a discussion question for each of the readings. If three readings are assigned for a specific date, you may write two discussion questions focused on two of the readings; however, individual discussion questions that each address the relationships between two or three of the readings assigned for a “DQ” date often are the most interesting ones. On dates when more than one chapter is assigned from the Lule or Jin textbook, you should not write two discussion questions that focus on two chapters from the same textbook.Discussion questions must be word-processed (single-spaced) and brought to class. In the case of discussion questions, under usual circumstances, “completing the assignment” means that you bring questions to class and engage in discussion of them, as opposed to sending the discussion questions to me by email, leaving them in my mailbox, or asking a peer to hand in your questions because you are not attending class. Having no funds to print your paper or having “printer problems” on a campus with numerous computer labs is not an acceptable excuse for failing to turn in hard copies during the class period when discussion questions are due. The requirements for discussion questions are that 1) they must be based on the readings listed on the course schedule for the “DQ” date; 2) they should not be rhetorical; 3) they should not already be answered in the readings; and 4) they should not be technical questions about what the author wrote. Instead, your questions should raise issues about the reading and its content. Questions, for example, may address a disagreement that you have with the author’s position, the relationship of an author’s claims to those in other course readings, or how the information and

You are going to ask two question from both two readings, GMPD and CP, but you don’t need to answer them. Your questions should be at least one page.

security proposal 3

by

The Dayton Soft Products executive staff has requested materials and your recommendations on the following security issues:

  • Is a security audit really needed? What are your recommendations for conducting such an audit?
  • What are the roles and responsibilities for the organization’s staff regarding security?
  • Is there any concern about Dayton Soft Products’ overall communications?

Compile a 3- to 4-page proposal that addresses solutions for the issues presented and includes:

  1. Reasons for why a security audit is necessary with your recommendations for conducting such an audit:
  2. Potential costs (personnel, finances, etc.)
  3. Proposed audit timeline
  4. Two recommend methodologies
  5. A RACI chart that identifies:
  6. the roles and responsibilities for the organization’s staff regarding security, and
  7. expectations for a) business units, b) IT staff, c) executive staff, d) sales, and e) support staff.
  8. Note: This chart may be embedded in your proposal as a table or spreadsheet file, or attached as a separate document.
  9. Answers to concern about Dayton Soft Products’ overall communications
  10. Three recommendations for securing the web communications—especially addressing internal needs and the growing global needs

assignment 2 motivation and performance management 2

by

Assignment 2: Motivation and Performance Management

Due Week 6 and worth 100 points

For this assignment, use the same company you researched in Assignment 1. I attached my paper 1 company I used IBM

Write a two to three (2-3) page paper in which you:

  1. Compare the difference between job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Determine which is more strongly related to performance for your selected company.
  2. Apply motivational theory and performance management principles to evaluate the company as a potential employer.
  3. Use at least three (3) quality references. Note: Wikipedia and similar websites do not qualify as academic resources.
  4. Your selected company may not be Google, Facebook, or Verizon.

Rubic:

1. Determine how both job satisfaction and organizational commitment relate to employee performance at your selected company.

Weight: 45%

2. Evaluate your selected company in light of both motivational theory and performance management principles to determine if it is a place you would like to work.
Weight: 35%

3. Cite 3 References.

Weight: 10%

4. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 10%


I attached my paper 1 company I used IBM

three page literature review personal reflection of researched paper

by

Annotated bibliography will be provided. As well as example of credible sources. This is a Literature Review NO OPINIONS basically stating facts and reviewing papers.

Paper:

three page paper followed by at least 5 (five) APA formated references cited in the paper.

Include in the left upper corner of page 1:
1. your name
2. 2020 topic
3. the final small topic
4. date
After inputing this information, begin your paper on page one.
Body of the paper:
– 3pages in APA format
This will be a literature review. There will be no headings in your three pages.
You are reporting on what you found in the scientific, peer reviewed literature.
References:
Minimum of 5 references used and cited in the body of your paper.
These five references will be in APA format on a single page following your three page paper.

Personal reflection of researched paper:

Critical reflection is a reasoning process to make meaning of an experience. It builds connections between
course content and the project experience. Do NOT re-tell me your paper or the topic.
Tell me what you learn, besides the topic, in the process of doing the total assignment.
150-200 words on one page.

are video games a bad idea

by

Instructions
Violent video games and the perceived negative impact on children, particularly in the area of aggressive and anti-social behavior, is a hotly debated topic. Explore the research on this topic. Based on your understanding of the research, complete the “What Am I Trying to Prove” template that is provided. Decide whether overall, you think that violent video games have a direct negative impact on behavior in children or not. Be sure to provide specific examples and references to social psychology theory, concepts, or studies that support your argument.

PSYC315 Week 7 Assignment Template.docx

Writing Requirements (APA format)

  • Length: 2-3 pages (not including title page or references page)
  • 1-inch margins
  • Double spaced
  • 12-point Times New Roman font
  • Title page
  • References page (minimum of 2 scholarly sources)

civil wrongs

by

  • Why do you think a society would address liability for civil wrongs separately from criminal wrongs? Should a wrongdoer be potentially liable both for civil wrongs as well as for criminal wrongs related to the same wrongdoing?
  • Sometimes people excuse the damage they cause by saying this was a mistake or that they did not mean to cause the damage. Is this a valid excuse to avoid liability for damage caused? Explain your answer.
  • In common law countries, strict liability was originally imposed for abnormally dangerous activities. What was the rationale for extending strict liability to everyday products sold in commerce? Do you agree with this extension of strict liability? Explain your answer.

OWNS WORDS AND REFERENCES AND 250 words

please assist in writing a 1 400 word paper report that details the psychological support framework to an agency that responds to a national catastrophic event

by

Develop the framework for an ideal psychological support agency to respond to a national catastrophic event.

Write a 1,400- to 2,450-word report that details the psychological support framework.

Include the following in your report:

  • The size of the agency
  • Qualifications and skills of the employees
  • Services provided
  • The key components of the agency and its overarching mission
  • How the agency can work with other organizations and what role the criminal justice system would play in this agency, if any.

Format the report consistent with APA guidelines.