Hello, need help in writing. Please, follow the instructions below, use the attached template and follow the attached rubric.

See the attached assignment2.

In this assignment, you are to use the same corporation you selected and focused on for Assignment 1: Strategic Management and Strategic Competitiveness and Assignment 2: External and Internal Environments.

Requirements

Write a 6 page paper in which you do the following:

• Analyze the business-level strategies for the corporation you chose to determine the business-level strategy you think is most important to the long-term success of the firm and whether or not you judge this to be a good choice. Justify your opinion.
• Analyze the corporate-level strategies for the corporation you chose to determine the corporate-level strategy you think is most important to the long-term success of the firm and whether or not you judge this to be a good choice. Justify your opinion.
• Analyze the competitive environment to determine the corporation’s most significant competitor. Compare their strategies at each level and evaluate which company you think is most likely to be successful in the long term. Justify your choice.
• Determine whether your choice from Question 3 would differ in slow-cycle and fast-cycle markets.
• Use at least three quality references. Note: Wikipedia and other websites do not quality as academic resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

• Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; references must follow SWS or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
• Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required page length.

Use the Assignment 3 Template [DOC] to ensure that your assignment meets the above requirements.

The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is as follows:

• Determine business-level and corporate-level strategies for a corporation’s long-term success comparable to the competitive environment.

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic and organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the scoring rubric.

Do you believe that ERM will continue to evolve, and if so, how?

2. Do believe that risk is a two-sided coin with both upside gains and downside losses?

3. How is value measured in your organization and do you believe the ERM process can add new value?

4. Besides risk maps and value maps, what other tools and techniques are available to manage risk and make risk-informed decisions?

You are required to respond to the questions thoroughly, in 250 -to-300 words for each question. Be sure to include at least three reference sources. APA rules for formatting, quoting, paraphrasing, citing, and listing of sources are to be followed.

1. this is for writing class（The theme is violent games），i will provide sample

Please complete an annotated bibliography entry for at least:

• 2 Scholarly Sources (Academic Journals, Books, etc.)
• 3 Popular Sources (Newspaper Articles, Magazine Articles, Blogs, Youtube, Twitter, etc.)

Please submit your entry as a Word Doc and insert them in the in the google doc “Class Annotated Bibliography” found in the Collaborations section. Please insert your source alphabetically.

Now that we have moved on to the Advocacy Project, you want your entries to be more critically geared.

• summarize the argument:
  • What is the topic/subject/problem? What is the author’s main claim/problem? What are some of the sub-claims/sub-problems? What is the author’s position regarding the problem or issue they identify?
• assess the source:
  • What kind of evidence/materials/examples are used to justify and support their claims? How well does the evidence work to support the author’s argument?
  • Are there any specific strengths and weaknesses of the argument?
• reflect on the source:
  • Will this source be useful to your problem, why or why not? If you think the source will be useful, how do you see it working to shape your argument (i.e. how will you integrate it into your argument)? Will the source be used to justify a particular subproblem you identify? Does it work to demonstrate the efficacy of a potential solution? (Remember, you will need to martial evidence to demonstrate both that a particular problem/sub-problem exists, as well as evidence that demonstrates that a proposed solution would be efficacious/effective.)

2.In this assignment, you will compare the online presentation of climate change material for two political candidates. These candidates must currently be competing with each other. These candidates do not need to be from the US – they can be from any country holding an election in the next 24 months.

Your assignment should include all of the following:

1) Screenshots of the two candidates’ webpages, if any, on this topic. If one of the candidates you select does not include information about climate change on their site, find information from the news or other sources on their stance on climate issues.

2) A comparison of how they frame the content of the topic. How does each candidate discuss the topic differently, and how do they relate to other topics that they care about? What aspects of climate change do they emphasize/minimize? What policies do they prefer? If they do not discuss the topic on their pages, search the web to figure out why not, and briefly describe what you find.

3) A comparison of how they present the content in a technical way. Is any aspect visual/interactive/innovative, or is it just text? Why do you think they have chosen to present it in this way?

You will need to write 400-500 words in total. Place everything in a single .pdf file for your submission.

Answer the following case study question in 5-10 sentences.

An Iraqi American male, age 59, is admitted to the intensive care unit of a large urban hospital during Ramadan. Hassan, who identifies as a Shiite Muslim, has multiple traumatic injuries, including fractured leg, following a motor vehicle accident while driving his taxi. Although the hospital staff are aware that male Muslim patients generally request to be cared for by male nurses, only female RNs are on duty in the ICU when Hassan is admitted. Hassan requires assistance with personal hygiene, dressing, shaving, bathing, wound care, physical therapy, and medication administration. He refuses to be cared for by females, due to cultural beliefs; insists on fasting during daylight hours during Ramadan; and wants privacy so he can pray five times daily, do ritual washing before eating, and adhere to other religious practices. Hassan’s wife is present, but she speaks very little English.

1. The patient has indicated Shiite Muslim as his religion on the admission form. How do you determine if it’s appropriate to contact the hospital chaplaincy office to locate an imam (Muslim religious leader) to visit the patient?

Directions: Respond to the two essay questions. Essays should be well-organized and well-written. The first question two asks you to synthesize the relationships between cognitive structures, cognitive processes, and communication. The second question asks you to integrate material from attribution theory with constructivism in order to develop your own new theory. Your ability to analyze and synthesize material is necessarily dependent on your ability to write clearly and effectively. So, I expect that your writing process will involve a good deal of editing and rewriting (and editing and rewriting some more). Please double space your exam and use 12-point font and set one-inch margins to allow room for feedback. This take-home examination is due on March 5.

Question 1

Constructivism (Chapter 6) is a theory that describes the relationship between cognition and communication. Employing the terminology of constructivism, describe the relationships between cognitive structures or cognitive complexity (pp. 111-112), social perception processes (pp. 109 to middle 111), and person-centered forms of communication (pp. 112-117). What is cognitive complexity and why is it important to constructivists? What forms of social perception should be related to cognitive complexity? Be sure to define what constructivists mean by “person-centered communication.” Include in your discussion the three specific forms of person-centered communication we discussed in class and be sure to describe what makes each form more or less person-centered. Why are the three forms of person-centered communication important? Incorporate Wilson’s discussion of goals to explain how and why cognitive complexity and social perception are related to the three forms of Person-centered communication? What kinds of goals does cognitive complexity shape? Wilson discusses cultural syndromes that shape goal formation. What is a cultural syndrome and what kind of cultural syndrome might shape the development of cognitively complex people that might ultimately shape goal formation?

Question 2

Part one of Q2

This question asks you to apply Kelley’s Covariation Model to a situation of your choosing (a hypothetical situation or an actual situation). Describe this situation in detail. Your description should be thorough enough that a reader who was not a part of this situation would understand the situation and would understand the nature of the social actors in your situation (their mannerisms, attributes, and their ways of treating other people) without knowledge of the covariation model. Your description of this situation should be relatively free of the theoretical terms that make up the Covariation Model. Next describe Kelley’s Covariation model in detail. What are the assumptions of the model? What is the purpose of the model? What are the key concepts that constitute this model? What are the three types of information the model assumes people work with to make attributions. Next, apply this model to your hypothetical situation and use it to illustrate the appropriate attribution in your situation.

Part two of Q2

We discussed a number of biases that we fall victim to in our everyday lives. Select three of the biases identified below. Define each of the biases and describe how each of the three might lead one to depart from the logic of the covariation model as described in your hypothetical situation.

Consensus bias (described as second-guessing in chapter 4), ego bias (described as self-serving bias in chapter 4), projection bias, fundamental attribution error, nonverbal bias (snap judgments), and attributions of success and failure, defensive attributions, the availability heuristic, representative heuristic.

The study of attribution models and biases make very different assumptions about people. Develop an explanation that integrates these two lines of research into a more coherent “attribution theory.” You might think about our desire to make good attributions or what we “get” from some of the different attribution biases.