All requirements have been uploaded

I have found the article that needs analysis. My major is finance, so this article is also about finance.

The article will be uploaded to you later, because I can no longer upload files at this time, up to five files for a problem.

1500 words

The discussion requires a minimum of 300 words, 3 scholarly sources, including the textbook. Make sure that you use APA style with your references. Under no circumstances use any direct quotes. Any directly quoted or copied material will result in a zero for the assignment. Let’s be sure to write it in own work 100% and give appropriately when using someone’s else work.

Reference for textbook attached:

Williams, S. J., & Torrens, P. R. (2008). Introduction to health services (7th ed.). Clifton Park, NY: Thomson Delmar Learning.

The most difficult issues facing health care delivery in the U.S. are extensive and often elusive. The following “Top 10” list includes some of the most critical issues and in need of attentio

• Fighting infectious and chronic diseases.

• Minimizing health disparities.

• Increasing access to quality health care services.

• Controlling health care costs.

• Reducing the size of the uninsured and underinsured populations.

• Addressing the challenges associated with the legal and regulatory environment.

• Meeting the needs of the aging population.

• Overcoming the shortages of adequately trained health care personnel.

• Assessing and assuring the quality of care.

• Improving health at the international level.

For this discussion, choose one of the issues from the Top 10 list and offer at least two strategies to address it from an administrator’s perspective.

Reminder for requirements: a minimum of 250 words (main post) and three scholarly sources.

1,500 word count and there is a total of 6 questions each (not including in-text citation and references as the word count), a minimum of 4 scholarly sources are required in APA format. For the 4 scholarly sources, one from the textbook that’s posted below and the other two from an outside source . Let’s be sure to write it in own work 100% and give appropriately when using someone’s else work. Under no circumstances use any direct quotes. Any directly quoted or copied material will result in a zero for the assignment.

Reference for textbook attached:

Williams, S. J., & Torrens, P. R. (2008). Introduction to health services (7th ed.). Clifton Park, NY: Thomson Delmar Learning.

Knowledge: What two changes in healthcare are most likely to happen? Why? What led you to this conclusion? Cite research for support.

Comprehension: Why do the authors you cite believe there is evidence this change will occur? What is your logic for coming to your conclusion? What are the specific implications for healthcare if these changes take place?

Application: Give an example of one change and describe the consequences for its implementation. Your answer must be specific, not general.

Analysis: Based on your example, what are three key drivers / root causes for this change?

Synthesis: Offer a new way to view / comprehend / understand the change you describe. For the change to be successful what philosophical changes would need to take place in our culture for the idea to gain broad acceptance? Offer a new idea or way to change the system.

Evaluation: How / why is your new way of conceptualizing the change different than the way it is commonly viewed now? Any unintended consequences of a change in ideology?

Type a two page paper regarding what you thought was the most important concept(s), method(s), term(s), and/or any other thing that you felt was worthy of your understanding Chapter-9 from the attachment. Define and describe what you thought was worthy of your understanding in half a page, and then explain why you felt it was important, how you will use it, and/or how important it is in project planning.

no plagiarism please. Please be thorough and hit distinguished in all areas of the scoring guide.

Introduction

Values and goals are important, not only to the organization but to individuals as well. Values and goals provide the framework for roles and responsibilities for those working in organizations. To strive to align with the values and meet the goals, individuals are tasked with different roles and functions. Kouzes and Posner refer to values as the stage for action and talk about how goals “release the energy” (2017, p. 255).

Clarity of expectations is key to effective leadership. It serves as the foundation to assess, evaluate, and provide feedback based on expectations. Feedback is important in order for those involved in any effort to know if they are on the right track. It is also important for purposes of adjustments that might be needed in order to meet or exceed expectations. Kouzes and Posner remind us that the word lead comes from the Old English word that means go, travel, guide.

In your main post:

1. Evaluate the meeting of lead based on the definition of go, travel, guide, using a criminal justice organization as a point of focus.
2. Describe the role of leadership based on values as the stage for action.
3. Explore the role of leadership in operationalizing goals to release the energy.
4. Determine how the actions of leaders, specific to values and goals, affect what individuals do within an organization.

Scoring guide

Criteria	Non-performance	Basic	Proficient	Distinguished
Main Discussion Post Response (60%)
Apply critical thinking or problem solving in the main discussion post. 50%	Does not apply elements of critical thinking or problem solving in the main discussion post.	Applies some elements of critical thinking or problem solving in the main discussion post.	Applies critical thinking or problem solving in the main discussion post.	Applies critical thinking or problem solving to the main discussion post in a comprehensive, step-by-step manner.
Use credible information or research to support positions, conclusions, or perspectives in the discussion. 10%	Does not use credible information or research to support positions, conclusions, or perspectives in the discussion.	Responds to the discussion, but some or all of the resources used for support are not credible.	Uses credible information or research to support positions, conclusions, or perspectives in the discussion.	Uses well- developed, relevant support from credible resources or research to support positions, conclusions, or perspectives in the discussion and impartially considers conflicting data or other perspectives