cjus685 topic selection and position evaluation

by

Plea bargaining is a common practice in every criminal court in the United States. One of the strangest concepts is that the prosecutor enters into an agreement with the defense counsel for the accused. In exchange for a guilty plea, the defendant will receive a fixed punishment that both parties agree on. However, judges often hand down sentences that go against the plea bargain if they disagree with the severity of the sentence (or in their opinion, lack thereof). Typically, the parties inform the judge of the plea bargain prior to the judge imposing the sentence.

Write 500–600 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas.

  • What are the major reasons for plea bargaining? Explain.
    • Do you believe that these are all valid reasons? Why or why not? Explain in detail.
  • Is plea bargaining a fair concept to all concerned? Why or why not? Explain.
  • How do you think plea bargaining conflicts with mandatory sentences? Explain.
  • What do you think are the most significant problems regarding plea bargaining? Explain.

Use references and APA style.

you will need to write five 5 literature reviews 1

by

Each Literature Review should include the following sections:

  • Provide full citation in MLA (or APA) format
  • Provide a brief summary as to what the reading is about
  • Give some information on the author(s)
  • Identify and define RELEVANT key terms and concepts
  • Give three pertinent quotations that might be used in the research paper
  • Interpret the meaning of each quotation and explain the significance for the student’s project. This might be done by writing a couple of sentences that connect terms and concepts from each quotation to the larger research project
  • For the second and subsequent readings, students should write several sentences explaining how the terms and concepts in the quotations connect to previous readings and trace areas of agreement and disagreement about particular topics
  • Identify new questions so as to delve even more deeply into the research

Your literature review should demonstrate that you have read the material closely, and that you comprehend it. Furthermore, these Literature Reviews could be of immense use not only in contributing to your body of knowledge about the topic under investigation, but also because sections of your reviews might be incorporated directly into your research paper.

CITATION/AUTHOR INFO 5 POINTS

● Provide full citation in MLA (or APA) format exactly as it will appear on your Works Cited (or References) page.

● Give one sentence of information about who the author/s are to verify that they are a credible and scholarly source.

Remember that the source must be substantive (no short sources), from a scholarly book or journal, and must include references or citations. Zero points given if the source is not scholarly unless I have approved it in advance.

SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT, METHODS 15 POINTS

● Summarize the text in your own words and make sure to cover the main argument of the source. Include a description of the methods the author/s used to develop the argument.

KEY TERMS OR CONCEPTS 10 POINTS

● Identify at least TWO important terms or concepts from the reading. Define each one according to how the term is used in the reading. One or both of the terms must be a theoretical framing concept (if the source has no theoretical content it is not likely to be a scholarly source).

QUOTATION ANALYSIS 20 POINTS

● Select three quotations that are important and relevant to your project. Write out each quote, paraphrase its meaning in your own words, and then interpret and analyze it in terms of your own developing argument.

SYNTHESIS 20 POINTS

● For the second and subsequent Source Evaluations, write several sentences of synthesis: Explain specifically how the terms and concepts in the quotations you selected connect to the texts in your previous Source Evaluations, and trace areas of agreement and disagreement between the readings.

OVERALL EVALUATION OF SOURCE 20 POINTS

● Reflect on how the source contributes to your research project. What are its limitations? What are its strengths? How timely is the source?

● What sources does your source use and how does it use them? Might any of those sources be useful to you?

● Identify any new questions you came up with while reading that might guide your future research.

ERROR FREE WRITING 10 POINTS

Your Source Evaluations should demonstrate that you have read the material closely, and that you comprehend how it fits into your own project. These Source Evaluations will be of immense use not only in contributing to your body of knowledge about the topic under investigation, but also because the analytical and synthetic sections of your evaluations might be incorporated directly into your research paper.

the resource:

https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi…

https://law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/1…

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-CONAN-1992…

https://olemiss.edu/depts/ncjrl/pdf/CLANCY/Clancy….

https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/…

respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words 91

by

Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:

This week focuses on the creation of an implementation plan and associated change management. Think of an example where change was attempted but failed, discuss what contributed to the failure and what might have been done to prevent it.

Include citations

1 page response paper

by

The paper

must be exactly one full page, with 1/3 of the paper devoted to summary of

the argument, 1/3 devoted to the introduction and explanation of a quote from the reading that supports the overall argument, and 1/3 of the paper devoted to student reaction to that argument.
There is also a sample response paper.

limit of function

by

exactly like last time. I will send you the quiz tmr and then finish each question and then send back to me. send me the answer once you finish it. dont wait until the last second and send me all at one time. after 11 hours, California time 10:00 am.

watch a video write down comment and own summary

by

watch a video, write down comment and own summary about 450 words, i will send the link to you.

complete short algebra worksheet wade

by

Please view the template and complete the worksheet in full…YOU MUST SHOW ALL WORK when completing the questions

Please make sure that you do not plagiarize the answers

I need ALL CORRECT ANSWERS PLEASE

government two page paper three references

by

The 1st amendment covers a lot more than just free speech. It also prevents the government from making laws which regulate an establishment of religion, prohibit the free exercise of religion, the freedom of the press, the right to peaceably assemble, or the right to petition the government for redress of grievances.Your assignment is to write a paper covering two of the subjects and how they work in today’s society.

it security discussion 4

by

Discussion 4

Discussion 4 Game Console Risks

Attacks against game consoles are rapidly increasing. Use the Internet to research attacks on game consoles. How are these attacks carried out? How many attacks have been conducted? What can a “gamer” do to protect herself from these attacks?

see below for instructions 5

by

CONVERSATION RECAPPROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION AND LEADERSHIP IN HEALTHCARE — C820PRFA — QVP1COMPETENCIES1013.1.1 : Self-Discovery and MindfulnessThe graduate evaluates and displays behaviors consistent with the process of self-discovery and mindfulness.1013.1.3 : Effective CommunicationThe graduate demonstrates appropriate patterns of effective communication.INTRODUCTIONCommunication requires both parties to make choices. These choices determine if the conversation willcreate value or create waste. These choices mostly consist of recognizing when a bioreaction occurs, how itimpacts listening, and being aware of listening differently.REQUIREMENTSYour submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no morethan a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even ifcited correctly. An originality report is provided when you submit your task that can be used as a guide. You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will beused to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubricaspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.Select a conversation where you had a disagreement that had an impact on you and triggered a bioreaction.The conversation could have been a long time ago or recently.A. Explain what happened during the disagreement by answering the following questions:• Describe the situation that led to the conversation.• When did you realize that there was a disagreement during the conversation?• Describe a bioreaction(s) that was experienced during the disagreement.• How did the conversation end?B. Analyze the conversation by answering the following questions:• Using the four levels of the conversation meter, what level were you listening at, and what level wasthe other person listening at?• Give examples of two factors that describe how you and they were listening in at these levels in theconversation meter: feelings, behaviors, language, or tone.• What were your points of alignment or disagreement?C. Reflect on how the conversation encouraged you to listen differently by answering the followingquestions: