please-read-the-instructions-below-22

Behavior Change.

If you recall my order of behavior change that I requested about two three week ago. This paper should be about that behavior change. I will be attaching the file for all the previous weekly behavior change written. And from here you can follow the instructions on how to write the paper AND Please follow the instruction very carefully and try to cover them all in writing about the behavior change.

  • Please write a short paper (4 pages max.) including the following points:
    • Identify the “problem” you will have spent the quarter addressing in your behavior change.
    • Evaluate your experience, including an analysis of the effect of your change, with the best measures you can make (for example, how many gallons of gasoline you saved, what percent of days you went without a sugary soda, or how many kilowatt-hours of electricity you conserved), and a summary of your personal perspective.
    • Discuss the significance of your change if it were widespread—how would society change if “everyone did it”? What marketing opportunities might be presented by this behavior change if a number of consumers took it on? Identify the marketing methods that might be used to effect widespread behavior change.
    • Discuss the barriers/challenges you encountered and the strategies you found to be most effective, if any, and consider the marketing relevance—if this behavior change effort were a large-scale campaign, how might those challenges and opportunities be addressed in the structure of the campaign?

12pt, Times, double-spaced, MLA format. And let me know if you have any questions. Also Please read the feedback posted at end of each week in the attached file to follow the paper in the right directions. try to provide a table at the end to explain the hours if possible

behavioral problems

Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:

How can you connect theory-based interventions to behavioral problems? Use specific examples to support your response.

scientific methods in week 1 you used the scientific method to design research studies basic and applied now you will select one of them either the basic or the applied one and build upon it using the skills you have developed since then you are go

Scientific Methods

In Week 1, you used the scientific method to design research studies (basic and applied). Now you will select one of them (either the basic or the applied one) and build upon it using the skills you have developed since then. You are going to write the ‘introduction and background’ and the ‘method’ section of your study. Make sure that you review peer reviewed articles so that you can model your sections after those in peer reviewed journal articles. The background section of your study should be supported by at least 10 peer reviewed journal articles. Be sure to also specify your experimental and null hypothesis. In the method section, you will need to identify the methods of data collection, the participants, and the procedure for your study.

At the conclusion of these two sections you need to write a rationale for your study that includes the following:

  • Analyze the types of sources used and how these choices may affect results.
  • Justify why your chosen methods of data collection are the optimal choice.
  • Discuss what type of approach you chose (e.g. qualitative, quantitative, or both) and evaluate why you chose this approach.
  • Submission Details

    • Please provide your answers in a 3- to 4-page Microsoft Word document.
    • Support your responses with examples.
    • Cite any sources in APA format.

answer-questions-about-food-justice

Please do the reading and write 1 paragraph on each those three questions:

1. Lewis, Ford and Pratsch (2017, ch. 9 in V&B) argue that food justice requires attention to racism –that, in the case of Detroit, racism has to be uprooted in order to realize food justice. Explain. Discuss the evidence they cite.

Reading: https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/j.ctt20q2404.13.p…

2. Ventura (2017, ch. 8 in V&B) and many others highlight the importance of soil when it comes to urban agriculture, food justice and building healthy communities. Explain. What’s all the fuss about soil, why now?

Reading: https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/j.ctt20q2404.12.p…

3. What are the 5 As of Food Security as spelled out by Ventura and Bailkey (2017, pp. 21-23 in V&B). How do these authors connect community food security and food system change?

Reading : https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/j.ctt20q2404.5.pd…

Please do the reading and write 2 paragraphs on each questions, Both of questions need to use two reading that I send:

  1. Fairfax et al. (2012, ch. 2) underscore the importance of “Framing Alternative Food.” Along similar lines, Allen, Cooley and Sims (2017, ch. 13 in V&B) argue that we need to reframe institutional power in order to bring about social and food justice. Drawing upon both of these publications, explain what is meant by “framing” alternative food and why this matters from a food justice advocacy standpoint. Weave into your essay the idea of “narrative ownership as a power shifting strategy.”
  1. Food systems are composed of, give shape to, and impact: (a) social, economic, political and cultural systems, together with (b) ecosystems, soil, water and earth’s climate. Explain how the prospect of increasing food justice in the world depends on addressing both sides of this coin: the social and ecological. Be sure to pinpoint some way the social and ecological interact. Give an example that seems hopeful (i.e., evidence suggests it may be a connection/relationship that can be amplified in ways that improve food justice and the environment).

Please use the simple language of those questions. Do not use any fancy words and only use the references I gives. Thanks

i-need-help-writing-a-biographical-paper-about-marcello-alessandro-1

Very simple. Pick a Baroque composer .

Write a biography,

Use at least 5 sources

Cite your sources,

minimum of 500 words

Pick one piece written by the same composer, and write about it.

response to melicent haagen dq1 1

An experimental study was performed with undergraduate nursing students in order to determine, between two methodologies, which is the best for learning standard precautions and precautions based on disease transmission mechanisms (Ramirez, 2018). Criteria which were controlled study were students that regularly attended in two year nursing program and those that agreed and signed informed consent to participate. This study has high controlled to study cause and effect with independent and dependent variables. The independent variable is the undergraduate nursing students. The variable is the self-instruction and clinical simulation on the topic of precautions.

Quasi-experimental research is quantitative research. The purpose of this quantitative, quasi-experimental study was to compare student outcomes from the traditional clinical education (TCE) model with those from the DEU model (George, 2017). DEU model is a dedicated education unit. Students were given a choice of which model and not randomly assigned to model. Student were given other choices in the start of the study proving that this quasi-experimental research was partial control that studies the cause and effect of the variable.

Non-experimental research article is about nursing documentation. The study was done with survey of nurses asking closed-ended question about the importance of nursing documentation. This study is concerned non-experimental research because it has no experiments on drug, treatment or procedure. The study showed nursing documentation to be important to workflow and relevant to patient care.

References:

George, L. E., Locasto, L. W., Pyo, K. A., & Cline, T. W. (2017). Effect of the dedicated

education unit on nursing student self-efficacy: A quasi-experimental research study. Nurse Education in Practice, 48. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2017.02.007

Grand Canyon University (Ed). (2018). Applied statistics for health care. Retrieved from https://lc.gcumedia.com/hlt362v/applied-statistics…

Kappes Ramirez, M. S. (2018). Influence of undergraduate nursing student teaching methods on learning standard precautions and transmission-based precautions: Experimental research. Nurse Education Today, 61, 101-105. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2017.11.007

Petkovsek-Gregorin, R., & Skela-Savic, B. (2015). Nurses’ perceptions and attitudes towards documentation in nursing/Stalisca medicinskih sester o pomembnosti dokumentiranja v zdravstveni negi. Obzornik Zdravstvene Nege, 49(2), 106-125. Retrieved from

is border security effective

4 pages, 12 point font, double-spaced paper including an introduction, body, and conclusion. APA formatting.

Please use the following article as one of three credible sources: https://library.cqpress.com/cqresearcher/document….

The other two sources need to be scholarly/professional articles or journals, please.

Paper needs to argue that boarder security along the United States – Mexico border is ineffective and why.

read an article then write an review essay important statistic knowledge required

follow the instruction attached below, statistic major needed.

how we evaluate japan s economy in last two decade how can policymaker help

Please write a paper about the monetary policy in Japan. Historical overview of monetary policy in Japan, including: the high growth period (1960s), oil and dollar shock (1970s), the bubble era (1980s), and the subsequent lost decade (1990s). Focus on the monetary policy pursued under two governors, Masakaru Hayami (1998-2003) and Toshihiko Fukui (2003-2008). The following points is to help you write the paper

background-essay-domestic-violence-or-family-violence-focus-on-women

Topic:(domestic violence or family violence, focus on women)

Length: 4-5 pages (1200-1500 words)

Format: APA format

Title: Include an informative, interesting, provocative and/or creative title

The purpose of this essay is to inform yourself and to identify what aspects of your topic you will research for the two subsequent essays.

For this paper, you will start by choosing a podcast and a case you are interested in, and identifying a social science aspect of that case. You will explore its background in greater detail. In this sense, you will be laying a foundation for the rest of your papers this quarter.

This, of course, leaves your field of selection fairly wide open, but think about an aspect of the specific crime or case that really interests you. Psychology, sociology, religion, economics, law, forensics, etc are all applicable huge general topics. You will, of course, want to narrow your topic down to something manageable for this paper. For example, you could look at the background of jury selection in the United States. You could also look at something like police questioning procedure. You could look at race relations in regard to profiling – there are an endless amount of complicated, interesting topics to work with here.

In this exploratory essay you will present background information relating to your proposed (narrowed) topic, including relevant history, laws and policies, statistics, past and current problems, stakeholders, organizations, programs, debates, and other related contexts, etc.

Remember that all three of the major essays for this course should generally be on the same topic, though the way that you narrow it and your research question will continue to evolve throughout the quarter (contact me if you want to change your topic altogether after submitting the Background Essay). As far as how this works with the rest of your papers, the Background Essay fits in and leads to the Literature Review and the Final Research Article; a revised version of the Background Essay will become the background section of your Final Research Article.

Required Elements

Introduction: The first paragraph of your essay should present some context for your narrowed topic and introduce the kinds of information and issues that your paper will present. Close your introduction with a single sentence that provides an overview of the main subpoints of information that your paper will cover. (Note that you are including an overview statement rather than a thesis statement since you are not putting forth an argument in this paper.)

Body Paragraphs: You should have at least five body paragraphs, each with a clear topic sentence, that cover the following types of information. Note, however, that you are not being asked to write one paragraph per aspect. For example, you may have more than one paragraph on history, and you discussion of history may include statistics.

historical background (including a relevant current event; may include descriptions of causes and effects, though keep in mind that those may be debated rather than “fact”);

statistics;

laws or policies;

stakeholders (e.g., communities, organizations, groups, agencies) along with their perspectives and interests;

debates and conflicts (what stakeholders may disagree about and why, but without taking a position in those debates yourself);

additional information can include relevant definitions, current news stories, key figures, programs, etc.

Conclusion:

The concluding paragraph should indicate any important information you were not able to find. Also, tell us how you intend to narrow your topic further, that is, what aspects of the topic you will continue to research. Next, propose one research question that you would like to answer about your narrowed topic; it should not be merely informational, opinion based, nor a good/bad, either/or, for/against, pro/con, yes/no, etc. type of question; nor should it predict the future or try to solve a problem (your job will not be to solve a problem in the three papers but to contribute to its analysis). Explain what is significant about your research question, that is, why is it important to understand that aspect in particular? Note that how you’re narrowing your topic and your proposed research question will continue to evolve. Do not use “I” or other forms of first person voice in the three formal essays for this course, including here in the conclusion.

Required Sources: A minimum of five substantial and diverse sources are required for this essay (at least two of which should be no more than two years old). Do not rely on any one source for the majority of your information; demonstrate that you have synthesized information from multiple sources, especially for your historical accounts. Experiment with various subject and keyword search terms and combinations. You should plan to sift through and evaluate numerous sources to finalize the ones that you plan to use. Your five sources must come from the three source types listed below, with at least one source from each type. If you make use of more than five sources, you may include some information from other source types, including organizational websites, documentaries, radio programs, news stories, etc., but be very cautious about the credibility and authority of sources.

Online or print references:

Magazine articles:

Books or book chapters:

***Note the difference between magazine articles (where the audience is the general public, as in Newsweek, or a particular segments of the public, as in Popular Photography) vs. academic journal articles (where the audience is made of scholars, such as Journal of Popular Culture or Journal of American History). You will focus on scholarly sources for the second major paper, the Literature Review. It can be difficult to distinguish between magazines and academic journals when you do a database search (e.g., on Proquest), but do try to understand the difference. You may end up using an academic journal article for the BE, but you should also make sure you have the other three required source TYPES listed above.

Quotations: You must have at least one quotation from each of your five sources. In addition to the required five quotations, you can also cite them (paraphrase or simply refer to them). If you have more than the minimum required five sources, you must cite all of them in the body of your essay even if you don’t quote from them. Follow APA guidelines to setup each quotation or citation grammatically with a signal phrase or attributive tag, and include a comment or explanation for each major quoted passage Include the page or paragraph numbers in your parenthetical in-text citations. The quoted passages should not be so many or so long that they dominate your own essay. The majority of the writing in the essay should be your own, not the authors’ you quote. You may need to indicate what source you are using more than once in a single paragraph: the reader should always know where you are getting your information from; there should never be confusion about whether you are stating your own ideas and interpretations or presenting someone else’s information or views.

Additional Considerations

Topic Selection and Narrowing: Before making a final topic selection, be willing to consider and even do preliminary research on more than one topic. Make sure you are focusing on a social science aspect of your topic rather than a scientific aspect. For example, do not attempt to write a paper on the effects of psychotropic drugs on brain chemistry, though you might, for example, explore the policies around mental health and medication for prisoners. Even though you must narrow your topic before getting started so that you are not biting off more than you can chew, you will likely have to provide background info that is more general than just your narrowed topic. For example, if you were writing a paper on mass transit in Seattle, it would be relevant to look at the history of mass transit more broadly along with the experiences of other cities. Your job will be to balance the specific information you provide about your narrowed topic and the broader background and contexts.

Information, Evaluation and Analysis: Of the three major essays, this one requires the least explicit written evaluation and analysis on your part, but it is still not a “data dump,” in which you just throw together all the information you can find. Although there may not be any such thing as objectivity, you should seek to remain neutral. Remember that in this paper you will not be putting forth an argument about your topic, which in fact you will not develop until the Final Research Article. Therefore, do not put forth your opinion, take sides in a controversy, or form judgments about what is right and wrong, good or bad. However, you will still need to exercise and exhibit your own critical thinking, judgment and creativity in narrowing your topic. You will also need to evaluate sources for credibility as you select, organize and present relevant information in a clear, concise and meaningful way.

Voice and Audience: Don’t use “I,” “me,” or other forms of first person in the three major essays for this course. Also don’t use “you” (second person) voice. Use third person speech, but avoid awkward and unnecessary uses of passive voice. Contact me in advance if you wish to include brief, relevant personal experience that you will discuss in the context of other non-personal published research. Never use first person to give your opinion (“I think” or “I believe”) or to narrate the trivial details of your own research experience (“Then I went to the library to find some more sources!”). For the Background Essay and other writing in this class, your audience is NOT the general public. Instead think of your audience as fellow researchers, for example, your fellow students in this class.