I need a reponse for 2 post in regards to drone aircraft. I am looking for 1- paragraphs for each one. with detail and NOT plagirized please. Something unique or different about each aircraft.

1. https://www.flir.com/products/black-hornet-prs/

2. http://uavfactory.com/prodcat/1

develop a graduate level Literature Review using at least 10 per reviewed references (for this assignment official publications such as national strategies, CBO and CRS reports, along with Think Tank reports from locations such as the Brookings Institute and RAND) are acceptable. Remember this is not an Annotated Bibliography and that a brief summary of the article will work for this assignment

Look to this reference when developing a Literature Review:

https://www2.le.ac.uk/offices/ld/resources/writing/writing-resources/literature-review

Technical Requirements:

Length: 6-8 pages double spaced, 1″ margins, 12 pitch type in Times New Roman font left justified format.

Citations/References: You must use APA style for this assignment.

Here are the requirement for this essay, I am already did this assignment but not meet the professor requirement. Please help me revise it and I will post the professor comment.

Critical thinking is a habit of mind characterized by the comprehensive exploration of issues, ideas, and events before accepting or formulating an opinion or conclusion. Critical thinking is the intellectually disciplined process of actively and skillfully conceptualizing, applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and/or evaluating information gathered from, or generated by, observation, experience, reflection, reasoning, or communication, as a guide to belief and action. In this assignment you will research a social change group/organization in our society (comtemporary or historical) and analyze the groups/organization efforts utilizing intersectional analysis to promote a better understanding of the group/organization, social issue(s), possible remedies, and practical actions individuals can take to support the group. Essential to the intersectional analysis is making clear your position on the group being analyzed. In doing your research on the group it is important explore critiques of the group/organization’s efforts, it is also important to be aware of your own biases. Your analysis should consist of 8 paragraphs, Introduction, one paragraphs for each component of intersectionality, and a concluding paragraph that includes reflection on your beliefs and actions now or in the future relating the issue(s) and organization explored. (Paragraphs should be 100-150 words, and paper should be between 800–1200 words).

Intersectionality is a way of understanding and analyzing the complexity in the world, in people and in human experience…Intersectionality as an analytical tool gives people better access to the complexity of the world and of themselves. (Collins & Bilge 2016, p. 2)

Intersectionality is an intellectual tool of analysis and praxis that can be organized in six core themes: Social Inequality, Power, Relationality, Social Context, Complexity, Social Justice. (C&B p. 25-30)

1. Social Inequality – Intersectionality supports understanding of the complexity of social inequalities beyond a single factor or category (i.e. race, gender, sexuality, citizenship) and encourages exploration interactions among various identities.
2. Power – Intersectionality supports understanding of power relations, as mutually constructed. Oppression is an interlocking system, where racism, sexism and classism are in relationship to each other and do not act in isolation. Power is exercised across four domains: structural (financial institutions), disciplinary (legal system), cultural (mass-media) and interpersonal (power and privilege).
3. Relationality – Intersectionality employs a both/and frame and rejects binary either/or constructs. Relationality is supported by inquiry and praxis that emphasize coalitions, dialogue, and collectives. Instead of exploring a social problem, through a single lens, relationality gathers perspectives from the multiplicity of identities and find areas of convergence.
4. Social Context – Intersectionality contextualizes inquiry and praxis by bringing attention to the ways in which particular historical, cultural, political, cosmological and intellectual arrangement shape our thinking and actions.
5. Complexity – Intersectionality as a form of analysis is not simple or clean. Weaving together inequities, power relations and social contexts is difficult and can be frustrating. As such, collective or collaborative efforts are encouraged to understand the complexity of the world.

– Intersectionality call attention to the incongruences of the social ideals of meritocracy, fairness and democracy, given the realities of global inequalities. Social justice challenges boot-strap, self-determined narratives citing the societal discrepancies, like everyone having the right to vote, vs. equal access to voting.Social Justice

Professor comment:

You have not completed a discussion of a social change organization. The women’s rights movement in the United States, for example, is composed of many different and sometimes conflicting organizations. You can refer to this list of prominent social change organizations to assist you in making a decision on which organization to discuss: https://www.activistfacts.com/organizations/

1) For this discussion, you will present an argument on each side of the topic you are researching in this course.

In your post, present the best argument you can on each side of your topic (Is abortion morally acceptable when the woman’s life is not in danger due to the pregnancy?). Present each argument in standard form, with the premises listed above the conclusion.

Consider how someone with the opposite point of view might criticize each argument. What might they say needs to be improved? Indicate briefly how you might address those weaknesses to strengthen your arguments further.

2) One of the most common and important argument form is the appeal to authority. For this discussion, you will discuss this argument form, as well as how to use it to improve your reasoning and your life.

In your initial post:

• Give three examples of appeals to authority (they can be from real source or experiences, or you can make them up). One should be very strong, one very weak, and one in the middle. Evaluate the quality of each.
• Provide an example of a time in which you or someone you know was fooled by trusting a source that turned out to be unreliable.

Provide another paragraph or two in which you discuss appeals to authority in general, by addressing some of these types of questions: How do we know which sources are reliable and trustworthy? Do you find that there are some types of sources of which people are too trusting? How might we learn to display the proper amount of skepticism and trust in relation to sources? Are people too trusting of media sources, and is there a way to overcome these tendencies? How can we make sure those are the best sources and not be deceived by deceptive ones?