Math Project! Please read the rubric (attached) to the math project very carefully. I need you to complete Part 1,2, and 3. Please also watch and listen to the instructions through this youtube link.
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwm7tMwWluU&feature=youtu.be
Our attention in Unit Seven shifts to preparation for the final portfolio, which is due at the end of this unit. The portfolio counts as 20% of your overall grade in the course.
Required Components:
Length: Your reflective essay must be between 800-1200 words. Your two best essays should be as long as they need to be fully achieve their rhetorical purposes.
Style/Format: The revised essays essays should be formatted in a standard scholarly format. (Most students follow MLA or APA guidelines, which are outlined in Easy Writer.) No matter what format you follow, be sure to do the following:
File format: Please submit your portfolio as a single file attachment in a .doc, .docx, or .pdf file. These formats are available in most word processors, including Google Docs and Open Office, and will ensure that your instructor is able to comment on your work.
Works Cited/References: Those essays that refer to outside sources must include a page of Works Cited, References, or whatever bibliography is required by the guidelines you choose.
Use of essays for future courses: Please understand that your portfolio may be used— anonymously—as a sample for future EN106 students and instructors unless you expressly request that it not be used. Your work will only be used for educational purposes.
This portfolio serves as the core assessment measure for EN106 at Park University. Let’s consider that term for a moment. At Park, a “core assessment” is a required assignment that is common across all sections of a course, both online and face-to-face. This assignment is meant to serve as a tool for instructors to evaluate student learning across sections, terms, campus centers, and modalities. In other words, the portfolio is your opportunity to show off what you have learned in this course, and an opportunity for Park faculty to learn more about how our teaching works. Ideally, we use the lessons from your core assessments to inform changes to curriculum. As you prepare the portfolio, think about using it to make an argument: to use a metaphor from the law, you should make a case for what you have learned this term in EN106.
Your portfolio should demonstrate what you know about academic research and writing. Your EN106 portfolio is a “best works portfolioâ€â€”that is, your portfolio should be a collection of your strongest, most polished academic writing. It will contain three primary pieces: a reflective essay, your two best essays from this class, and artifacts from your writing process.
For most students, the two essays will be the same two essays you improved through revision and expansion in Unit Four and Unit Six.
The next Canvas page will describe in more detail the expectations for your portfolio, and some of the possibilities for how you might organize it.
Your portfolio will be evaluated as a whole according to the following assessment standards. Please note that while these standards are similar to those used to grade your essays throughout the course, they are not identical. Please read through these assessment criteria and ensure that your portfolio demonstrates each outcome. In general terms, significant weakness in any one of these areas reduces the grade of your portfolio by a letter grade. However, serious weakness in one area can lead to the loss of two or three letter grades or to a failing grade. We can also discuss these grading criteria in the Instructor’s Office.
|
Competency |
Exceeds Expectation |
Meets Expectation |
Does Not Meet |
No Evidence |
|
Process: |
Student demonstrates clear evidence of using process and social/collaborative practices to draft, revise, edit, and proof-read. |
Student shows some evidence of using process and collaboration to write. |
Student does not demonstrate the use of process or collaboration. |
No portfolio submitted. |
|
Focus: |
The focus, or thesis, of each student essay is not only clear but insightful, memorable, and fully supported. |
Student’s writing consistently has a clear focus, though it may not always be unique or insightful. |
Student essays are either unfocused or feature commonplace or generic theses. |
No portfolio submitted. |
|
Development: Apply strategies for developing academic arguments across the disciplines, including conducting research and incorporating culturally diverse perspectives. |
Student essays demonstrate successful and deliberate development strategies, especially in the use of research and culturally diverse perspectives, such that each essay seems fully argued and complete. |
Student essays demonstrate some use of development strategies but show room for further development in research, argument, or incorporating diverse perspectives. |
Student essays are unsupported, needlessly repetitive, unclear, or otherwise underdeveloped. |
No portfolio submitted. |
|
Rhetorical Strategies: Consider the rhetorical situations faced by academic writers to respond appropriately in both writing and research. |
Student consistently displays an awareness of audience, context, and genre, and responds creatively and appropriately. |
Student shows some awareness of rhetorical situations and responds appropriately. |
Student shows little awareness of rhetorical situations. |
No portfolio submitted. |
|
Conventions: |
Student essays make meaningful use of standard formats and conventions in structure, tone, documentation, and mechanics. Although a few mechanical errors may be present, they do not impede understanding. |
Student essays are relatively standard in terms of format, documentation, and mechanics. Errors may be present, but do not impede understanding. |
Student essays use inappropriate tone or structure, contain mechanical errors that impede understanding, or show serious deficiencies in terms of documentation (e.g., no Works Cited or References page). |
No portfolio submitted. |
EN 106: First Year Writing Seminar II: Academic Research and Writing
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLE Thinking 1: Sources and Evidence (Critical Thinking)view longer description threshold: 3.0 pts |
|
— |
|||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLE Thinking 2: Access the needed information (Critical Thinking)view longer description threshold: 3.0 pts |
|
— |
|||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLE Thinking 3: Evidence and Reasoning (Critical Thinking)view longer description threshold: 3.0 pts |
|
— |
|||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLE Comm 1: Explanation of Issues (Communication)view longer description threshold: 3.0 pts |
|
— |
|||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLE Comm 2: Organization (Communication)view longer description threshold: 3.0 pts |
|
— |
|||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLE Comm 3: Conclusions (Communication)view longer description threshold: 3.0 pts |
|
— |
|||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEN106.CLO.01view longer description threshold: 3.0 pts |
|
— |
|||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEN106.CLO.02view longer description threshold: 3.0 pts |
|
— |
|||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEN106.CLO.03view longer description threshold: 3.0 pts |
|
— |
|||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEN106.CLO.04view longer description threshold: 3.0 pts |
|
— |
|||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEN106.CLO.05view longer description threshold: 3.0 pts |
|
— |
|||||
|
Total Points: 0.0 |
|||||||
1. Title I Section 102 of the PATRIOT Act ensures civil rights, regardless of religion or ethnicity. With this law in mind, how would you train new agents on racial profiling and identifying possible terror suspects? Outline the main points of your training workshop.
Your response should be at least 200 words in length.
2. You are a criminal defense attorney. Your client has been charged with violating Title 18 USC 1038 for playing a practical joke on his teacher. He called the school and said that a bomb had been placed in his teacher’s desk. Everyone was safely evacuated; no one was injured. Explain to your client, in terms he can understand, what he is being charged with and what his likely sentence will be if convicted.
Your response should be at least 200 words in length
3. You have just arrested Mr. John Smith for violating Title 18 USC 831. Provide a short summary of the acts he engaged in that led to his arrest.
Your response should be at least 75 words in length.
4. A citizen of the United States enters the U.S. Capitol while concealing a radiological weapon. He has no intention of using this weapon and just wishes to see if he can get in and out undetected. Has this person committed a crime? If so, what would be the charge, and what provisions of the law would make that action illegal?
Your response should be at least 75 words in length
lay out the rationale for the concept, including the problem or opportunity it addresses, the market for the product or service, and the key features that set it apart from the competition. You should also discuss how the concept fits with the mission, vision, and priorities of the company implementing it and how or why it is innovative.
For additional details, please refer to the Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric document.
Grant writing
Initial Post: Provide the name of a nonprofit group and discuss how organizations use grants to fund programs. Be sure to list the benefits of using grants. Explain how you might pursue other grants.
-Please read the attached document
-Must compare the book to one of the five critical approaches (please tell me which approach you are going to use by Sunday
-Must submit an outline of the essay by next week
-No paraphrasing, only use quotes
Case Study 1: Auctions-Spring 2019
Due Week 7 Worth 250 pts
The following video describes auctions as price discovery mechanisms https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kWuxfVbIaU
Use the video on auctions and at least 3 academic and/or high-quality business publications, see definitions below, to answer the following questions in 5-7 pages:
1. There are many types of auctions each with strengths and weakness at uncovering the real price/value of an item. Compare and contrast:
a) the English and Dutch auctions; and,
b) the sealed bid first price auction and the Vickery Auction.
2. Concierge Auctions Limited sells very high end and unique properties worldwide using an English style auction, selling to the highest bidder. They have been embroiled in multiple law suits, see the link to the Wall Street Journal. Advise Concierge as to the weakness that an English auction may have in uncovering a property’s value. Provide a recommendation for at least one other auction type which may better uncover the value of unique real estate properties.
3. Auctions are widely used in finance, e-commerce and in e-games. Identify 3 uses of auctions by firms in finance, e-commerce and/or e-games. Explain the:
a) need for an auction in the product/service; and
b) what type of auction is used and why that type of auction is appropriate for the product/service.
4. Auctions are also widely used to generate revenue for not-for-profit organizations. What are the advantages/disadvantages of auctions as revenue generators for not-for-profit organizations?
5. Suggest ways in which the company you work for, or the company which you aspire to work for, can use auctions to better uncover value and increase revenue.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12) with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment length.
Acceptable Types of Publications
The definition of a high-quality professional business publication is one which is primarily a publication directed to reporting and/or analysis of the workings of business. Examples are: Wall Street Journal, Bloomberg, Reuters…etc. Avoid general news publications such as USA Today, Washington Post, NY Times.
PLEASE DO NOT RELY ON WIKIPEDIA, INVESTOPEDIA OR ANY OTHER PEDIA AS A REFERENCE AT ANYTIME IN THIS COURSE.
Submission Rules
You may submit 1 attempt at the assignment to test your SafeAssign Score. The SafeAssign score should be 25% or less.
You may submit ONE AND ONLY ONE ADDITIONAL ATTEMPT.
Copy of Article Auctions King Under Attack Concierge Auctions.pdf
n questions according to the passage.Can use the network to search the answer, but need to summarize their own, cannot copy and plagiarize!
I attached the guideline for reference, it doesn’t has to be strictly followed but do follow most of the requirements. I have started the introduction (first page done)and have an outline for the essay (feel free to change it). I also have a rough thesis statement(feel free to change it). For this essay, we can simply use a six paragraph structure with Rogerian Strategy: an introduction, summarization of opposing views, statement of understanding, statement of position, statement of contexts, conclusion .
Please use the same topic, my topic is on personal information and privacy. The common ground for rogerian strategy can be privacy. It’s a pretty open topic, it should be easy to work on.
Citation needs to be less than 20%.
MLA format.
Need to use at least 7 sources, at least 1 from New York Times but it can not be all from New York Times.
Don’t need any fancy words 🙂
Thank you so much!
Respond on below Lab questions. List the references and elaborate responses in
your own words:
see attached please: