In this assignment, you are to choose a reading and apply it to a recording of talk in interaction. The point is to try out and thereby test the theoretical and/or methodological approach presented in the readings to real discourse, with dual purpose: to learn more about the conversation and to learn more about the interpretive method. You should submit a single Word or PDF file containing two documents: your paper and the marked-up transcript of the excerpt you analyze. Begin with a cover sheet that clearly states the main point of your paper, and also includes your bibliography. Your paper begins on page 2. The maximum length for papers is three pages typed, double-spaced, not including cover sheet, notes, charts, or appendices. Your paper should include one to three brief excerpts from the transcript and provide a detailed analysis of each excerpt. Your written assignment should have all the organizational and presentational characteristics of an academic paper. For example,  The assignment is structured to demonstrate one main point that is clearly stated at the beginning and at the end, and that provides a focus for your argument throughout.  Make clear throughout the paper how each statement you make contributes to the main point.  State why the main point is important and/or interesting. What is the relation to what others have written / found? In particular, how does it relate to the reading in question?  Illustrate your analysis by reference to short examples from your conversational excerpt. Be sure to cite lines of the transcript to support your points. Set off examples by extra spaces and use line numbers to help the reader. To get everything into three pages, here is a suggested way to use the space:  Half-page intro paragraph previewing the analysis  Half page to explain where the transcripts come from  One and a half pages in which you present transcripts and analysis  Half page conclusion explaining how your analysis is a good illustration of the theory or method you chose There’s a particular style of presenting and analyzing transcripts that is specific to discourse analysis. Here are some guidelines:  Introduce example lines by (a) explaining what is happening in the conversation at the point at which these lines appear, and (b) stating beforehand what the example lines are meant to illustrate.  Put the lines (with line numbers) to which you are referring in the text of your paper where they are discussed. Do not make your reader search for them in the attached transcript. A reader should find all necessary material at the point at which it is needed rather than having to flip back and forth between documents.  As a general rule, most excerpts will be 2–5 lines long, with an occasional excerpt of up to 10 lines or so. It is almost never necessary to exceed this length. If you would like to use a longer excerpt, it is almost always better to break it into smaller excerpts and discuss each separately.  By underlining or using arrows in the left margin, highlight the example line(s) that are significant to your discussion.  Conclude presentation of each example by restating what it is meant to show. Do not leave the example lines themselves as the last word in a paragraph or section of the paper. After your paper, attach the transcript of all conversational excerpts analyzed in your assignment. Indicate every instance of the phenomenon under analysis in your transcript, but select only a few instances for discussion in your paper. If it is useful to write or draw on the transcript to illustrate your point, do so—for example, by using different colors to highlight phenomena (repetition, constructed dialogue, adjacency pairs, etc.). Be sure to summarize in your written assignment what you have done on the transcript and what it shows.

Textbook: Ahearn, Laura. 2017. Living language: An introduction to linguistic anthropology, second edition. Wiley

Recording for Analysis: The trailer for the Netflix show Dating Around: https://twitter.com/netflix/status/1096487593661714432

Assignment 1: Economic Brief

Due Week 5, worth 150 points

This assignment is aligned to these course outcomes:

Explain economic principles and their applications in the real world.

Summarize the different types of market structures and the role of government in economics.

In the workplace, we are often asked to create “briefs.” A brief provides a snapshot, or short, written summary, of a situation or event that has occurred. It is generally just a few pages long and may include additional visuals like a graph, chart, or table. In this assignment, write a brief about economic concepts in an industry that interests you.

An example economic brief, template, and resources are provided below.

Example Economic Brief, Assignment 1 Template, Strayer Writing Standards (SWS)

3.Review an example brief.

4.Use the optional template to help you get started.

5.Get familiar with the Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). (See Instructions below.)

Industry Selection

Use this resource to select an industry and learn about the products and services it provides:

oNAICS (North American Industry Classification System)

Select the number next to the industry to see its subsectors, e.g., select 52 to see Finance and Insurance.

Select that same number again to read about the industry as a whole or select a sub-category. For example, Mining is 21, and Oil and Gas Extraction, a sub-category, is 211.

Instructions

Review your previous chapter readings and use the resource above to develop an economic brief that is two to three (2-3) pages long in which you:

7.Select an industry and describe the goods and/or services this industry produces. Use the NAICS resource above to help you select an industry (and/or subsector) for your brief.

8.Identify this industry’s market structure and at least two or more market characteristics that support this market structure. (Market structures are covered in Weeks 3 and 4.)

9.Describe any notable microeconomic relationships, market outcomes, and/or trends in this industry. Include a graph, chart, or table containing related data. (Microeconomic relationships and market outcomes are covered in Weeks 2 through 4.)

10.How might government impact this industry’s market prices, output, and/or market structure? (Government intervention through price controls, industry regulations, and antitrust enforcement is covered in Weeks 2 and 4.)

11.This course requires use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The format is different compared to other Strayer University courses. Please take a moment to review the SWS documentation for details. (Note: You’ll be prompted to enter your Blackboard login credentials to view these standards.)

Your brief should include a cover page.

Your brief should be two to three (2-3) pages in length (not including the cover page), double-spaced, 12-point font.

Your brief should include a minimum of one (1) reference/citation in the text.

please i need the presentation as soon as possible in 1d&12h

more info in the attach

Presentations

You only need to summarize, in your own words, the conclusion of your first progress report (a virtue ethics perspective on your topic), the conclusion of your second progress report (a deontological analysis), and a utilitarian analysis. Next, share your, overall conclusion on your topic (“I think the death penalty is unethical because…”). Finally, share your thoughts on which of the 3 ethical schools of thought to be most compelling or most helpful for thinking through ethical questions (“I find the Categorical Imperative most helpful because…”, “I am a convinced utilitarian because…”—Note: you don’t have to agree with just 1, or with any, school of thought). It should be about five minutes long.

ETHICS RESEARCH TOPIC

You will have to explore this issue through the perspectives of each ethical school. The reports concern the first two ethical schools covered (respectively), you must present on the perspective of each school, compare & contrast the schools of thought (the benefits of each, how convincing each is, etc.), and conclude with your opinion. The final paper consists of the same, but more thoroughly demonstrated.

Final Paper

The final paper is essentially a revised, more thoroughly argued, and properly composed essay-version of your presentation. The word limit is ~1,500 words, but, as always, this is not a hard limit. You can decide which format to use, just be consistent. Properly cite your works, but only cite primary sources (ex: do not cite an article about Kant’s ethics). When citing a broad idea (such as “moderation”) you can just cite a chapter (sans translator, publisher, etc.). When citing a direct quote or a specific idea (such as the Formulation of Autonomy), cite the page number. Use a full citation (translator, publisher, year, etc.) for direct quotes and specific ideas if you are not citing from the common texts (the Bartlett & Collins translation of the Nicomachean Ethics and the Hackett editions of the Grounding for a Metaphysics of Morals and Utilitarianism).

As with your presentation, your final paper will consist of six (though, not necessarily equal) parts:

An introduction to your topic

A virtue ethics/Aristotelian analysis of your topic

A deontological/Kantian analysis

A utilitarian analysis

Your conclusion on the topic (The death penalty is/is not ethical because…)

Your reflection on the different schools of thought (which school of thought you found most helpful/which parts of each you thought were most compelling/etc.)

Students mustreview the case study and answer all questions with a scholarly response using APA and include 2 scholarly references. Answer both case studies on the same document and upload 1 document to Moodle.

Case Study 1 & 2 Lyme Disease and Peripheral Vascular Disease