Please read the two page article and watch the 3 minute video. After reading the article and watching the video I would like you to write a one complete page essay on the ethical use of CRISPR for designing human babies. You may either support or be critical of the use of this technology and you must defend your position on the issue in the essay.

Please no plagiarism and use simple grammar as my first language is not English

You can analyze a different book if you want, but it has to be about physics.

NO PLAGARISM

Key Elements: All of these elements should be easily found in your analysis. (Required)

❏ Who is the author and what is his/her general background? Why might they have written this book?

❏ An explanation of the author’s thesis: What is the focus of this book? What was he trying to say?

❏ What struck you or stood out in this book and why? Be as reflective and thoughtful as you can. This is the soul of the paper.

❏ How does this book change/challenge the way you look at or think about some previously held belief about the world? If it did not change or challenge anything for you, then carefully explain why.

Reading –
40 Short Stories: A Portable Anthology – “Happy Endings” by Margaret Atwood, “Interpreter of Maladies” by Jhumpa Lahiri, “Birdsong” by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie.

Haddon, M. (2003). The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time, last 75+ pages. Note: this text does not have traditional page numbers.

Browdy de Hernandez, J. (2010). African women writing resistance: An anthology of contemporary voices. Madison: University of Wisconsin PressRead Mtungwa, Sibongile. “Woman weep no more”, pp. 43-49. please link to

Spencer, R., & Ortiz, J. (2014). All about skin: short fiction by women of color. Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press. Read Fairness by Chinelo Okparanta, pp. 30-39.

For this assignment, you will write a 2-page compare and contrast paper on two of the authors from this week’s reading or video. Be sure to give equal weight to each author. You may include some background information on your authors, especially if their backgrounds impacted their subject matter. When writing about short stories, you do not want to simply restate the plot or events in the story, but instead, focus on the details of how each author handled the theme of the story. In this case, you might want to examine how the author explored gender roles in the time period of the story. Remember, this may not be in the same period as the author is writing but could be a different period in history.

Ideas to consider when comparing and contrasting (these are not required, just suggested):

• Do both stories reflect the same theme? If not, what is the theme of each story?
• What are the characters’ conflicts? How does each character resolve that conflict or do they?
• Are there any epiphanies? (An epiphany is where the character changes as a result of the conflict)
• What about symbolism? Are any major symbols or metaphorical images used?

For this written assignment, select one recent (within the last two years) evidence-based article from a peer reviewed nursing journal that describes a “best practice” in an area of nursing you are interested in. For example, if you would like to be a pediatric nurse, select an article that discusses a best practice in pediatric care.

Cite the article and provide a brief overview of how the results or findings were obtained. Then describe the “best practice.” Conclude your discussion by explaining whether you thought the research findings supported the conclusions and the best practice.

This assignment must be no more than 3 pages long. It should include all of the required elements. Use APA Editorial format and attach a copy of the article.

Submit your completed assignment by following the directions linked below. Please check the Course Calendar for specific due dates.

Save your assignment as a Microsoft Word document. (Mac users, please remember to append the ‘.docx’ extension to the filename.) The name of the file should be your first initial and last name, followed by an underscore and the name of the assignment, and an underscore and the date. An example is shown below:

Use the Sun Coast Remediation data set to conduct an independent samples t test, dependent samples (paired samples) t test, and ANOVA using the independent samples tab, paired samples tab, and ANOVA tab in the Sun Coast data file. The statistical output tables should be cut and pasted from Excel directly into the final project document.

Independent Samples t Test: Hypothesis Testing

Restate the null and alternative hypotheses, cut and paste the statistical output from Excel Toolpak, discuss the p value in relation to alpha, and explicitly accept or reject the null and alternative hypotheses.

See example below:

Ho4: There is no statistically significant difference in mean values for the DV between Group A (IV₁) and Group B (IV₂).

Ha4: There is a statistically significant difference in mean values for the DV between Group A (IV₁) and Group B (IV₂).

Provide data output results from Excel Toolpak here. See example below:

Interpret and explain the independent t test results below the Excel output here. Include alpha level, p value, and reject or accept the null hypothesis.

Example:

The results indicate that the mean values are lower for Group A; however, the results also indicate a p value of .37627 > .05. Therefore, the null hypothesis is accepted that there is no statistically significant difference in mean values of the DV between Group A (IV₁) and Group B (IV₂).

Dependent Samples (Paired Samples) t Test: Hypothesis Testing

Restate the hypotheses here.

Provide data output results from Excel Toolpak here.

Interpret and explain the dependent t test results below the Excel output here. Include alpha level, p value, and accept or reject the null and alternative hypotheses.

ANOVA: Hypothesis Testing

Restate the hypotheses here.

Provide data output results from Excel Toolpak here.

Interpret and explain the ANOVA results below the Excel output here. Include alpha level, p value, and accept or reject the null and alternative hypotheses.