Using as reference: 

Title: Leadership For Health Professionals 

Edition: 3rd (2017) 

Author: Ledlow, Coppola Publisher: Jones & Bartlett Book 

ISBN: 978-1-2841-0941-2 

Chapter 8: “Leadership Models in Practice” 

Discuss the following in no less than 200 words:

How would you apply at least one contemporary leadership model from this chapter to a real (or hypothesized) health leadership situation or case? Explain the rationale for your decisions, actions, and behaviors 

In two different paragraph with no less than 75 words give your personal opinion to Julie Skala and Kerri Collins 

Julie Skala 

I would have applied the Hargrove and Glidewell’s Impossible Leadership Model to the situation that occurred at my facility when they constructed a new children’s hospital.  Hindsight is said to be twenty twenty, but I believe had the leaders had this to follow, they may not have gotten the state in the situation they did by being three hundred million over budget, top directors forced to leave and giving the public a poor perception of our institution.

Hargrove and Glidewell’s model is based on “impossible jobs in leadership” (Ledlow and Stephens, 2018) and heading this project falls in this category. The project started and was approved by the state, received a large private donation, and then was placed on the back burner. It then returned and eventually was constructed and completed in 2017. Investigation ended up finding there was no one project leader and bills/projects just kept getting approved.

If I were to follow the Hargrove and Glidewell’s model, I would be a prudent and public administrator (Ledlow and Stephens, 2018) This model requires me to be constantly ready for change, which is exactly what the leader should have been prepared for. Constant changes to the structural plans, staffing, forecasts etc. I would need to use my intuition and be prepared to deal with the political side and the public. 

I would have set up a leadership that was accountable and able to work with the state and organization to reach its goals.

References:

Ledlow, G. R., & Stephens, J. H. (2018). Leadership for health professionals: theory, skills, and applications. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning. 

Kerri Collins 

The Bolman and Deal Reframing Leadership and Management in Organizations Model promotes situational leadership.  This model focuses on structure, people, symbolic, and political constructs.  (Bolman and Deal’s Four-Frame Model, 2020) Bolman and Deal believe problems arise with inadequate structure.  This model also states there must be a “good fit” when naming a leader of the people.  The political construct deals with allocation of resources and symbolic leadership lends itself towards visionary leaders. (Gerald R. Ledlow, James H. Stephens, 2018)

An example of this leadership model is a recent change at my own healthcare organization.  Through a bi-annual employee satisfaction survey, hospital leadership determined the therapy department within our hospital was too large for one director.  Having one director for over 60 employees was seen as a problem with structure.  The employees in this department seemed unhappy with the lack of leadership, not necessarily the leader herself.  As hospital leadership listened to the employees, they knew a change must be made.  Within the department, a developing leader was identified and named director of inpatient therapy services while the current director remained responsible for outpatient therapy services.  Leadership recognized the resources available within the department and ensured a good fit as this person had experience and was trusted by employees within the department.  She understood what processes worked and what processes needed changing.  These departments run much more efficiently with fewer employees per manager.

References

References

Bolman and Deal’s Four-Frame Model. (2020). Retrieved from Accipio: https://www.accipio.com/eleadership/mod/view.php?id=1666

Gerald R. Ledlow, James H. Stephens. (2018). Leadership for Health Professionals. Burlington: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

ReferencesBolman and Deal’s Four-Frame Model. (2020). Retrieved from Accipio: https://www.accipio.com/eleadership/mod/view.php?id=1666

Gerald R. Ledlow, James H. Stephens. (2018). Leadership for Health Professionals. Burlington: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

ReferenceBolman and Deal’s Four-Frame Model. (2020). Retrieved from Accipio: https://www.accipio.com/eleadership/mod/view.php?id=1666

Gerald R. Ledlow, James H. Stephens. (2018). Leadership for Health Professionals. Burlington: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Part one:

This is a biology of cancer, and you need to create a hypothesis of how you might treat  Pancreatic cancer . There is no true or false answer, but it is about how you devolve your hypothesis. The professor want us to find out at least three primary journals from NBCI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) and draw a conclusion of how to treat a pancreatic cancer. He want a se way of treating cancer. YOU need to make the hypothesis very clear and direct and you need to explain all the details. 

Things you cannot do:

– Do not bring a treatment that have been already been used, you need a new work.

– You cannot use non credible sources like websites ends with .org .com etc. but you can use .edu and I am requiring all the information to be from a PRIMARY JOURNALS.

– You cannot use surgical methods, this class about biology of cancer, so your methods should be in biological contents, and not surgically. 

Sample of the paper:

Hypothesis:

(You write the thing that you want to target in pancreatic cancer cells, and why you think it is import to target this thing, and you state clearly how you would do that)

– Your hypothesis should be not copied, neither have been used before!!

– Your hypothesis should be supported by three journals.

Hypothesis supports:

You list the three primary journals links from NBCI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/)

And under each journal link explain what information, or idea you used from this journal. 

Part two: AFTER you turn part one, I will contact you to do another three assignment related to the hypothesis. YOU will write a summary for each journals, you will write a research proposal, and finally you will create a PowerPoint about this (each assignment will be in separated order and money).

Provide at least two quotes or scene descriptions from the movie to defend your point 

After viewing one of the films listed in the “Topic 1 Discussion Question Film Resource” from the topic materials, answer the following two questions. Before you post, change the title of the post to include the title of the movie you are discussing. 

1. What is one worldview depicted in the movie? 
2. Which characters held that worldview (e.g., pantheism, theism, atheism)? 

Provide at least two quotes or scene descriptions from the movie to defend your point. 

 Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed: I. Introduction: In this section, you will discuss your social science issue and select resources that you can use to research the issue. Specifically, you should do the following: A. Describe the issue in the social sciences that you have selected to investigate. Why is this issue significant? B. Describe at least three social science resources that you could use to investigate the issue you selected. Your sources must be relevant to your issue and must be of an academic nature appropriate for the issue. In your description, consider questions such as these: What are the similarities and differences in the content of your sources? What makes them appropriate and relevant for investigating your issue? What was your thought process when you were searching for sources? How did you make choices? II. Body: In this section, you will use the social science resources that you selected to investigate your issue, focusing on an appropriate audience and the social science principles related to the issue. Be sure to cite your sources. Based on your research, address the following: A. Identify the social science principles that apply to your issue. In other words, which principles of social science apply to the issue you selected? B. Explain how the principles you identified apply to your issue. In other words, how are the social science principles you identified relevant to your issue? C. Identify an audience that would be interested in your issue. For example, who would benefit most from hearing your message? Or who could best help in addressing the issue? D. Describe how and why you can tailor your message to your audience, providing specific examples. For example, will your audience understand social scientific terminology and principles, or will you need to explain these? How will you communicate effectively with your audience? III. Conclusion: In this section, you will conclude your research investigation by discussing future directions for research. Specifically, you should do the following: A. Based on your investigation, develop a research question related to the issue you selected. In other words, what would you like to know more about? B. Explain how a social scientist would go about investigating the research question you developed. In other words, what would the next steps be if a social scientist were to continue researching your question? IV. Provide a reference list that includes all of the social science resources you used to investigate your issue and question. Ensure that your list is formatted according to current APA guidelines (or another format with instructor permission). 3 Project One Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Your research investigation should be 3 to 5 pages in length and should use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. You should use current APA style guidelines (or another format approved by your instructor) for your citations and reference list. 

Topic: Struggles that surround the women of Iran 

 In your research paper, you will also provide a recommendation to resolve the major political, economic, and/or social issue that you are addressing.  

 As you gather and read through your project sources, you should begin building your outline. This week, you are required to submit a substantive outline with your thesis statement and your potential arguments/discussions. This outline should not be a rough draft. It should be at least 2 pages, written in substantive, sentence-format, showing a clear road map of the research you found and how it supports the recommendation you are proposing to resolve the major problem(s) that you identified. It must include at least half of the content for final draft and substantive research materials with at least 5 credible and scholarly sources. Include APA citations for any resources used as references.