watch the films “Gone Baby Gone” and “Sleepers”. Pick one movie and apply Kant’s moral philosophy to judge the MAIN FINAL action. For “Gone Baby Gone” judge Patrick’s final decision and for “Sleepers” judge the priest’s final decision. Judging any other action in the movie is an automatic zero. 500 words minimum in MLA format. 

*You must apply Kant’s 3 premises (course materials) for 50 points and Michael Sandel’s 3 contrasts (Week 6 Lecture “Mind your Motive”) for 50 points.

 Please read below statement: 

IMPORTANT PLEASE READ FULL INSTRUCTIONS. NO PLAGIARISM! NO QUOTES, MUST PARAPHRASE. I WILL CHECK FOR RECYCLED WORK AND PLAGIARISM. THIS ASSIGNMENT IS DUE 10/28/21 AT 9PM PST. IF YOU CANT MEET THIS DEADLINE, DONT AGREE TO DO MY ASSIGNMENT. PRICE ISNT NEGOTIABLE. PLEASE READ GRADING RUBRIC. TEACHERS USE THE GRADING RUBRIC TO DETERMINE GRADE. PLEASE UNDERSTAND BY ACCEPTING TO DO MY WORK, I HAVE STRICT RULES. I DONT LIKE TO DISPUTE, BUT I WILL IF DIRECTIONS ARENT BEING FOLLOWED. IF I SEE SOMETHING WRONG AFTER PURCHASING, I WILL GIVE YOU A CHANCE TO FIX IT IMMEDIATELY. THIS DOESNT MEAN HOURS  LATER. IF YOU TURN SOMETHING INTO ME EARLY, I EXPECT YOU TO FIX MY ASSIGNMENT IMMEDIATELY. DONT LIE TO ME, IF THESE RULES ARENT FOLLOWED, I WILL DISPUTE
 

In this discussion, you will propose three topics for your an assignment for this course.In your first post, propose three health disparity topics that resonate for you and would consider as topics of your assignment. To be a good topic, each proposed topic should be Topics to be used: Vaccination, alcohol use, economic stability 

• Narrow enough to have a single or modest number of causes.
• Broad enough to be significant to the population being affected.
• Important to you.

For each of the three topics that satisfy the above criteria, write one paragraph that includes answers to the following questions:

• Which populations are most affected?
• What you think are the most significant underlying causes of this disparity (e.g., health behaviors, social determinants, etc.) and how you think disparity can be ameliorated?
• Which level of prevention (i.e., primary, secondary, or tertiary) is most appropriate and why?
• How can theory be used to better understand and address the health disparity?
• Why does this subject interest you, and why do you want to find answers?

Chapter 11 of the textbook covers “Analysis of Variance”, however the authors state that “Testing for Equality of Three or More Population Means” might be a better chapter title.

Use Excel or SPSS to perform the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the data in “From Data to Decision” on page 565 of the textbook attached.

 Create a matrix (table) that organizes details about 6 data sets: UHDDS, UACDS, DEEDS, MDS 3.0, IRF-PAI, and OASIS.  

1. The acronym and complete name of the data set
2. The type of healthcare setting in which the data set is used
3. Brief overview of the types of data collected
4. Brief evaluation of the purpose of the data set
5. Two (2) potential issues in data collection and quality for the data set

Please post your discussion for BOTH topics and discuss in-details. We will not have any discussion for the w8 but for this week we tried to cover that.

Part 1: Case Study, Challenging questions

Dr. Jones and Dr. Smith are researchers based in the same department at a UK university. They have been working on a joint research project for several years, publishing a number of articles on their work in peer-reviewed journals. The two researchers are now producing a book about their research. The research was conducted under the auspices of their university.
The final manuscript was submitted to the publishers a while ago and Dr. Jones contacts the firm for an update. He is surprised and very upset when the publishers tell him that the book is to be published by Dr. Smith as the sole author. Dr. Jones is informed that his role in both the research and the book itself will be acknowledged in the list of contributors to the project, nothing more. The publishers’ decision is based on information supplied by Dr. Smith.
As far as Dr. Jones is concerned, he wrote the book with Dr. Smith and should also be credited as an author of the work. Indeed, he is convinced that he and Dr. Smith had previously agreed that the book was a joint work and that they would each receive co-authorship. He does not remember having any written record of this agreement or of any discussions regarding authorship.
Dr. Jones speaks to Dr. Smith in an attempt to reach some sort of agreement on the matter but the position remains unchanged. He then tries speaking to the publishers of the book. They say that they have received reassurances from Dr. Smith which they accept and they have no plans to change the attribution of authorship.
Prior to this dispute, Dr. Jones believed that he had a good working relationship with Dr. Smith. As well as wanting to resolve the issue of authorship, he is also concerned how his career may be affected by the dispute with Dr. Smith.

In your response to this sectionanswer to at least 2 following questions:
– What could Dr. Jones do?
– What ‘evidence’ or other information might shed some light on the matter?
– How might the situation be resolved?
– Could anything have been done to prevent this situation from occurring in the first place?

Part 2: Ethics in Research

What is Ethics in Research & Why is it Important? please discuss in details

Background: https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/le/content/266713/viewContent/11354213/View