This is due Wednesday October 4, 2017 by 5 pm. Thank you!

Instructions

You are the administrator of a clinic with 50 employees. You have been tasked with facilitating discussion with other health professionals in your clinic to select a new EHR system, which will be implemented across the organization. Please complete the assignment as indicated in the instructions below.

Part 1

Competency Assessed

Build effective teams.

Instructions

Construct a plan to build 1-2 effective teams to collaborate in selecting a new EHR system for the clinic. Identify the professional roles that should be represented on your team(s). You should be prepared for possible disagreements regarding priorities and processes, so your plan must include at least three (3) team/consensus building methods.

Part 2

Competency Assessed

Interpret concepts of change management theories, techniques and leadership.

Instructions

Evaluate the concepts of change management theories, techniques, and leadership by assessing typical challenges seen with implementing a new EHR system across an organization. Your evaluation should demonstrate that you have considered how a transition to EHR would result in the need to plan for change management interventions. Provide two (2) examples of challenges arising from EHR adoption and detail the change management theories that you would enact to overcome resistance to change.

Part 3

Competency Assessed

Implement a departmental strategic plan.

Instructions

Demonstrate implementation of a departmental strategic plan by detailing at least two (2) areas of risk exposure mitigation, organizational or process re-design, training, or communication strategy, as they relate to EHR implementation.

Part 4

Competency Assessed

Evaluate the stages of the procurement process.

Instructions

Demonstrate understanding of the purpose of the procurement process. What are the purposes of the Request for Proposal (RFP), the Request for Information (RFI) and the Request for Quotation (RFQ)? Provide detail for when and how to use each to help an HCO more fully identify its needs and the issues involved with planning for significant projects or purchases.

Assignment Requirements:

● Please complete all parts in a Microsoft Word document.

● The body of your document should be at least 1200 words in length.

● Quoting should be less than 10% of the entire paper. Paraphrasing is necessary.

● Students must cite and reference at least 4 credible sources from the KU Library.

Include all references used and cite in text where used! No plagiarism!

Directions:

Consider cultural influences in trends and fashions that you are familiar with. There is a list below that presents some items you may want to consider, but you are free to pick something else you think of as well.

You are to select a contemporary item of dress, adornment or accessory from this culture or another culture or subculture. You will need to have an electronic image(s) of the item in your report. Describe the item and its function as dress in today’s cultural environment. You need to have a MINIMUM of 3 references and cite them using an acceptable, consistent style used for the course – APA. Discuss the following questions in your assignment

Questions

1. Whatistheoriginoftheitem/trendofdress?Isithistorical,social, psychological, cultural, other, or a combination of two (2) or more? Some discussion points to keep in mind would be; what decade did the trend/item first appear? What country? Etc.
2. Whatsortoffunctiondoestheitem/trendofdresshaveforits wearers: is it identification, art, tradition, function, a combination,

etc.? Some discussion points to keep in mind would be; is it worn for

ceremonies? For dressy occasions or can it be worn everyday? Etc.

1. Is the item/trend meaningful to all people in the culture or subculture,
   or to a selective group within the culture or subculture?
2. What meanings are associated with the items – by the wearer and also
   interpreted by observers?
3. Overall, WHY do people who wear or use the item, wear and use the
   item?

The list (below) presents some items/trends you may want to consider from various cultures. Try searching online using key terms mixed with decades or regions or people, etc. (example: “Jackie Kennedy and style and 1960s” or “jackets and England and 1960s” or “wedding rings and America and 1980s” – DO NOT now use these examples for your paper, you will receive a 0 if you do). Think about seasons or decades as well and how that can affect items or trends. There

Different types of ______ for men or women – or both:

Hairstyles
Shoes/boots/sandals/heels
Hats
Bathing suits
Coats/outwear
Athletic wear/sportswear
Watches/jewelry
Glasses/sunglasses
Make-up/cosmetics
Leggings/pants/pant styles/etc
Tops/shirts/t-shirt styles/etc
Men’s suits (casual or business)
Women’s business outfits
Dominant styles of subcultures (punk/mod/jock/etc) Various types of body art/adornment

1. GDP and GDP Per Capita:  compare these values for your country with those for the United States, keep the year used as close as possible (the same year is preferred, if available), be specific about the currency in which the numbers are expressed – you should be able to obtain all values in US Dollars.  If the values are in Purchasing Power Parity (PPP), do note that – most likely they will be in PPP.
2. Using the data you collected for question 1, compare the standard of living of your country to that of the United States (remember that by definition, GDP Per Capita is the universal measure of standard of living, but you may also include other variables if you wish).
3. What is the most recent inflation rate and does it compare to the inflation rate for the same year in the United States?
4. What is the most recent rate of growth of the country and how does it compare to the economic growth rate for the same year in the United States?
5. What explains the recent economic growth, or lack of growth in your country?

use paragraphs and a report structure to your post. 

For the Midterm Paper Assignment, you use your Bibliography to help you write a 6- to 10-page paper about this topic. I

In your paper, present a logical and concise description of the environmental health issue (Water-borne disease)and the public health significance (Cholera) in a background section. Include a detailed characterization of potential or likely exposures and the health impact on human populations. 

Describe any current public health actions, including activities, policies, or procedures to address the issue, or make recommendations for those that may be applied. 

Your 6- to 10-page Midterm Paper is to follow APA format and must include the following sections: 
• Title page 
• Background 
• Assessment of Exposure 
• Assessment of Public Health Impact 
• Current Status of Action or Proposed Action (U.S. or other relevant geographic location) 
• APA formatted Reference List 

The body of the paper is to be 6–10 pages, not including the title page and references. APA style headers are expected for each section, and you may use sub headers as needed for readability. 

Please provide 7 pages of excellent paper on Cholera

Introduction to Aeronautical Science

Case Analysis: Aviation Human Factors

2-3 page paper/essay on aviation human factors. Your paper should be grammatically sound and free of spelling errors

Format

– Two to three pages text (maximum, include a reference page; and a title page)

– Double-spaced lines

– Times New Roman 12 pitch

Process

I.  Review materials from outside sources regarding the case

II. Diagnose the case (identify the issue/problem, define the significance of the issue/problem)

III. “Size-up” the case (determines the influence of the issue/problem, decide what was done well, and identify what could be improved)

IV. Provide recommendations (identify courses of action; what would you do differently?)

Develop a case analysis on this topic:  Select a commercial aviation accident that was concluded to have resulted from pilot error. Determine the primary and any secondary human factors contributions to the accident. Consider pilot training, organizational culture, organizational rules/policies, ergonomics, aircraft design limitations, etc., when identifying an issue for your case analysis

Upon submission, your work will automatically be evaluated through the plagiarism detection tool. Ensure your work is entirely your own. Cite your sources!

Refer to the assignment guides and rubric in the activity and ensure your case analysis conforms to the assignment requirements. Use the rubric as a guide when completing this assignment

ATTENTION

• Turnitin enabled (Turnitin report  less than 5%. )
• Original your work don’t copy other source or student paper work , do your own word
• APA formal style

 

 

 

 Case Analysis Undergraduate Rubric

 

Case Analysis Undergraduate Rubric
Criteria	Ratings	Pts
Summary	Superior / 9 – 10 Points / Provides an exemplary summary and develops a coherent, central theme that is supported in a well-structured, organized, and logically-consistent manner throughout. 10 pts Above Average / 7 – 8 Points / Provides an effective summary and develops a coherent, central theme that is supported in a well-structured, organized, and logically-consistent manner throughout. 8 pts Average / 5 – 6 Points / Provides a sufficient summary and develops some level of a central theme that is expressed in an acceptably organized manner. 6 pts Below Average / 3 – 4 Points / Provides minimal summary that lacks any coherent, central theme; illogical structure and organization. 4 pts Failure / 0 – 2 Points / Provides a dissatisfactory summary that lacks any coherent, central theme; illogical structure and organization. 2 pts	10 pts
Problem Statement	Superior / 18 – 20 Points / Comprehensively identifies and isolates one specific problem. Identifies factors contributing to the problem with accurate details. Substantiates problem statement with external source(s). 20 pts Above Average / 16 – 17 Points / Identifies and isolates one specific problem. Identifies some factors contributing to the problem with accurate details. Substantiates problem statement with external source(s). 17 pts Average / 14 – 15 / Identifies and isolates a problem with some evidence of contributing factors. May be lacking substantive support of the problem statement. Uses assumptions and has missing information that are not revealed and addressed at any level. 15 pts Below Average / 12 – 13 Points / Writing generally shows minimal evidence the student has done the required research and analysis, consisting instead of opinions, feelings and impressions. 13 pts Failure / 0 – 11 Points / Writing generally shows no evidence the student has done the required research and analysis, consisting instead of opinions, feelings and impressions. 11 pts	20 pts
Significance of the Problem	Superior / 18 – 20 Points / Clearly establishes the significance of the problem statement. Presents a strong, well-supported argument based on relevant concepts, theories, and frameworks. Presents accurate outcome predictions that support immediate action to resolve the problem. Identifies outside sources of support. 20 pts Above Average / 16 – 17 Points / Establishes the significance of the problem statement. Presents a well-supported argument based on relevant concepts, theories, and frameworks. Presents outcome predictions that support immediate action to resolve the problem while using some outside sources of support. 17 pts Average / 14 – 15 Points / A valid argument with at least some reference to relevant concepts, theories and/or frameworks is present; exhibits thoughtfulness; makes some effort towards predicting outcomes. 15 pts Below Average / 12 -13 Points / Arguments presented, if any, are mostly from opinion and not from evidence; while containing little linkage to relevant concepts, theories and/or frameworks. 13 pts Failure / 0 – 11 Points / Arguments presented, if any, are from opinion and not from evidence; while containing no linkage to relevant concepts, theories and/or frameworks. 11 pts	20 pts
Alternative Actions (Two Each)	Superior / 18 – 20 Points / Realistic approach to resolving the problem. Reasons for each alternative are clearly articulated Advantages and disadvantages are thoughtful and give cause for reflection on the results of implementing one or the other alternative action. A decision could be made solely based upon the information provided. 20 pts Above Average / 16 – 17 Points / Realistic approach to resolving the problem. Reasons for each alternative are articulated Advantages and disadvantages are somewhat thoughtful and give cause to think about the results of implementing one or the other alternative action. A decision could be made with the help of the information provided. 17 pts Average / 14 – 15 Points / An approach to resolving the problem is provided. Reasons for each alternative are provided. Advantages and disadvantages are present. Outcome of implementing one alternative or the other is not clear. A decision could possibly be made based upon the help information provided. 15 pts Below Average / 12 – 13 Points / A decision based upon either alternative would be difficult to make without additional information. 13 pts Failure / 0 – 11 Points / A decision based upon either alternative would be not be possible without additional information. 11 pts	20 pts
Recommendation	Superior / 9 – 10 Points / Creative approach to resolving the problem. Reason is clearly out of the ordinary. Advantage and disadvantage are thought provoking. Answers the question “What if we tried something completely different”? A decision to implement could probably only be made by someone who believes it is easier to get forgiveness than it is to get permission. 10 pts Above Average / 7 – 8 Points / A good approach to resolving the problem. Reason to support the approach is well supported. Advantage and disadvantage are well thought out. Answers the question “What if we tried something different”? A decision to implement could probably only be made from these actions. 8 pts Average / 5 – 6 Points / A somewhat more realistic approach to resolving the problem is provided. Reason is provided. Advantage and disadvantage are present. Outcome of implementation is positive. A decision could possibly be made based upon the information provided. 6 pts Below Average / 3 – 4 Points / Realistic approach to resolving the problem is barely present. Rationale lacks articulation. Advantage and disadvantage are illogical. A decision could not be made without clarification from the analyst. 4 pts Failure / 0 – 2 / Realistic approach to resolving the problem is not present. Rationale lacks articulation. Advantage and disadvantage are not present. A decision could not be made using these actions. 2 pts	10 pts
Mechanics	Superior / 9 – 10 Points / Uses proper APA citations and references; grammatically-sound and free of spelling errors, follows required formatting rules; and fully addresses given assignment. 10 pts Above Average / 7 – 8 Points / Uses proper APA citations and references with very small errors found. Still grammatically-sound and free of spelling errors, follows required formatting rules; and fully addresses given assignment. 8 pts Average / 5 – 6 Points / Citations are sometimes missing and/or are incorrect; an acceptable level of writing is exhibited, even with a few mechanical mistakes, but the communication is clear nonetheless. 6 pts Below Average / 3 – 4 Points / Very little support of citation; grammar, spelling, and/or word choice errors are frequent enough that the communication is muddled. 4 pts Failure / 0 – 2 Points / Lack of any sort of citation. Grammar, spelling, and/or word choice errors are frequent enough that the communication is incomprehensible. 2 pts	10 pts
Accomplishment of Research Learning Outcomes	Superior / 9 – 10 Points / The case analysis strongly accomplished all 6 of the SLO’s for Research and strongly supports the institutions Research Quality Enhancement Plan. 10 pts Above Average / 7 – 8 Points / The case analysis accomplished the majority of the 6 SLO’s for Research and supports the institutions Research Quality Enhancement Plan. 8 pts Average / 5 – 6 Points / The case analysis accomplished some of the 6 SLO’s for Research and satisfactorily supports the institutions Research Quality Enhancement Plan. 6 pts Below Average / 3 – 4 Points / The case analysis accomplished little of the 6 SLO’s for Research and does not satisfactorily support the institutions Research Quality Enhancement Plan. 4 pts Failure / 0 – 2 Points / The case analysis accomplished none of the 6 SLO’s for Research and does not satisfactorily support the institutions Research Quality Enhancement Plan. 2 pts	10 pts
WW_AERO_ASCI_202_LO_03.1 view longer description threshold: 1 pts	Meets Expectations 1 pts Does Not Meet Expectations 0 pts	—
WW_AERO_ASCI_202_LO_04.1 view longer description threshold: 1 pts	Meets Expectations 1 pts Does Not Meet Expectations 0 pts	—
WW_AERO_ASCI_202_LO_05.1 view longer description threshold: 1 pts	Meets Expectations 1 pts Does Not Meet Expectations 0 pts	—
Total Points: 100