Cloud Computing

Provide a reflection of at least 500 words (or 2 pages double spaced) of how the knowledge, skills, or theories of this course have been applied, or could be applied, in a practical manner to your current work environment.(Devops Engineer). 

Requirements:

Provide a 500 word (or 2 pages double spaced) minimum reflection.

Use of proper APA formatting and citations. If supporting evidence from outside resources is used those must be properly cited.

Share a personal connection that identifies specific knowledge and theories from this course.

Demonstrate a connection to your current work environment. 

You should NOT, provide an overview of the assignments assigned in the course. The assignment asks that you reflect how the knowledge and skills obtained through meeting course objectives were applied or could be applied in the workplace. 

View an introduction to the Assignment. Be sure to adjust your audio settings.

Unit outcomes addressed in this Assignment:

• Apply data collection strategies to collect valid and reliable data.

Course outcomes addressed in this Assignment:

• PU550-1: Implement data collection strategies to collect valid and reliable health data.

Instructions:

In this scenario you have been selected by the Faculty to assist with a worldwide research project on Food Insecurity.  Review background information on Food Insecurity issues in the U.S. You will visit two grocery stores near you and complete the NEMS evaluation instrument on each store and then write a 1–2 page reflection on your experience.

• Be sure to review the Survey Instructions document for specific instructions on completing the instrument prior to going to the stores.

• Submit your data electronically using the following website: https://cedarville.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_eqYYRVkbuNRRbed 

You need to complete 1 survey for each store a total of 2 surveys need to be completed. Enter Kimberly Crawford for first and last name.

At the end of each survey you will get a “thank you” screen. Screen shot that, for each completed survey. you have to include it with your submission. 

• For reference, a document copy of the survey is available to view/print.

Requirements:

• Complete data submitted electronically for two qualified stores.

• A 400–500 word reflection submitted providing an overview of your experience collecting the data.

attach 2 screen shots of completed surveys and a word document  of your experience collecting the data.

 The video is attached:  

Video – Logical Fallacies

URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RdSB137pFrs

Module Assessment

Journal Assignment # 7

Part 1 – Select three fallacies from this module and discuss how they have affected you in the past and how you plan to correct this in the future.

Part 2 – Discuss one deduction trap from Chapter 7 and explain how it affected your thinking in a personal example.

Remember:

• Type the Journal in a Word document and save it all semester until you have completed the 10 assignments.
• Student writing is expected to be coherent, grammatically correct, and mechanically-sound.  Points will be deducted for poor writing. 
• All journal entries should be a minimum of 300 words in essay form. 

View the media located in this week’s Learning Resources. Think about how Sandra’s understanding of the transactional model of communication helped her to understand noise that gets in the way of communication and how communication can change during the process.

With these thoughts in mind:

Post by Day 3 a 1 to 2-paragraph discussion. In this post you should answer the following:

Using the transaction model of communication to analyze a recent conversation you had:

1. Describe the conversation briefly.
2. Identify, within your conversation, each part of the model (who were the communicators; what was message; channel; what was the feedback, etc.) 

Be sure to support your ideas by connecting them to the week’s Learning Resources, or to something you have read, heard, seen, or experienced.

 

Review the draft capstone project paper assigned to you (from title page to reference page). Critique the draft by analyzing the content and providing extensive comments evaluating scholarly discourse (grammar, theme development, transition, clarity, and appropriateness of content). Communicate your feedback in an encouraging, professional manner. All edits should be made on the actual document using track changes.

Feedback and critique on the draft paper should address the following:

1. Does the writer make the barrier or issue clear in the introduction?
2. Does the writer’s course of action for addressing the barrier or issue follow the logic model?
3. Does the writer meet the criteria for each section as presented in the assignment?
4. Analyze the writer’s anticipated effects of a change initiative upon an organization.
5. Analyze the writer’s potential issues related to sustainability.
6. Does the writer use professional health care terminology appropriately and correctly?
7. Does the paper flow smoothly? Does the paper follow a clear organizational pattern? Do the body paragraphs occur in a logical order? If not, suggest which paragraphs should be moved, where they should be placed, and why.
8. Does the writer provide enough information from the research and supporting articles to clearly support the change project for a nursing intervention?
9. Do you notice any errors in grammar, mechanics, punctuation, or formatting?
10. What advice can you give this writer for each section of the paper and to improve the draft overall (suggestions for improvement, outside resources/sources)?

Your feedback will help your fellow student identify possible strengths, weaknesses, and basic errors. Be thorough, keeping in mind that the suggestions you provide will help your classmate make the changes necessary to complete a more successful paper.