Description: For your fourth milestone in your final project, you will provide an in-depth analysis of the key elements related to your chosen issue (IMMUNIZATION).

Your analysis of the issue should build on your Milestone Three outline and address the following elements:

A. Analyze the needs and interests of the key stakeholders you identified. Be sure to provide specific examples.

B. Apply current healthcare laws, policies, and financing practices to the issue. Be sure to highlight any potential financial ramifications associated with the issue.

C. Explain why stakeholder value conflicts may exist in this environment. Be sure to justify your reasoning.

D. Evaluate the legal risks and malpractice issues you identified in Milestone Two, being sure to analyze how conflicting values may impact potential legal risks.

Guidelines for Submission: Your analysis should be 2 to 4 pages in length. It should be formatted in 12-point Times New Roman font, double-spaced, with one- inch margins. All citations and references should be formatted according to current APA guidelines. 

** Milestone 2 & Milestone 3 attached for reference**

Respond to discussion question and also respond to Mariah. This needs to be at least a paragraph for each response.

• Imagine you’re thinking about buying a new car. Before making this important decision, you’ll want to gather as much information as possible to help make the right choice. Determine the level of trust that you would place in information provided by the following sources: a salesman at the car lot, the dealer’s Website, social media (i.e. Facebook), an associate from work, and a close friend. Discuss the key factors involved in assessing the amount of trust that you put into each source.
• Imagine you’re in a position to persuade another person. You sincerely believe that your position is 100% right. Explain whether or not you would slant information in such a way as to make your point(s) seem more credible. Discuss the primary ethical dilemmas that this scenario could cause for both you and the person whom you are trying to persuade.

Mariah Stinnett

So, assess the trust I would put into any of these sources. For starters I don’t believe any of these sources are technically credible. So, it all comes down to trust at this point. Which of these sources can you rely on the most? When faced with the situation of buying a new car and the sources of a car salesman, the dealer’s website, social media, an associate from work, and a close friend who would I think to trust the most? Of course, I would go with a close friend. In most cases a close friend has your best interest at heart is going to give you the best advice based off your relationship. Next, I would have to go with social just because you can get a poll of multiple people’s opinion all at once and use that to compare your decision. An associate from work is not really a good source to me because its not really a close friend and the most likely would care less about helping you make a good decision on purchasing a car. Lastly, I believe the most bias an untrustworthy source would be the cars salesman and the dealers website. Obviously, they have one motive only and that’s to get you to make a purchase from them. You can’t trust that they are going to give you and honest feedback when they have one goal to meet. I am not saying every cars sales man do not have genuine motives, but we can only go off our own judgement in these scenarios.

If I was put in a situation where I had to persuade someone on something I thought was %100 correct I would not slant my information to persuade my argument. I guess this scenario really comes down to a person’s character. Some want to be politically correct so bad that they will go to any length to prove themselves.

You are the presidential adviser faced with addressing the environmental health implications of global climate change. First, define global climate change. Second, provide an overview of what issues you are expecting in the next 5–10 years and their human health and environmental implications. Third, summarize the Paris Agreement with a discussion of how the agreement will address climate change as well as any weaknesses in the agreement. Provide a recommendation if the US should rejoin the Paris Agreement or not with a justification. Please answer the question in a 2–3-page paper.

You are the registered nurse performing a health assessment on a newborn infant. From the functional health pattern portion of the assessment, you learn the mother is reluctant to breastfeed her baby. How do you respond? Explain the approach you will take to ensure adequate nutrition for the newborn, with or without breastfeeding. Provide rationale for your answer.

As with Surveillance Systems, it is critical to understand the various systems used in healthcare to collect data in a clinical setting. It is also critical to understand the various standards, which allow the sharing of information about a patient to provide quality care.

Tasks:

Based on your reading, create a 5- to 6-page document in Microsoft Word, which includes the answers to the following questions:

• Describe and explain the basic components and benefits of an EHR System.
• Describe and defend your opinion on the current status of hospitals meeting the requirements of MU today and in the future?
• Examine and discuss briefly the HIE and the need for standards.

Submission Details:

• Cite any sources in APA format.
• Name your report SU_PHE3070_W2_A2_LastName_FirstInitial.doc.
• Submit your report to the Submissions Area by the due date assigned.