The grant application process is all about money. Without money to accomplish your public health intervention, your plans are nothing but words on a piece of paper. The grant application process is all about convincing a person or entity to give you money to support your plan. Your primary goal in the budgeting process is to make a convincing argument that the money will be spent well.

There are many elements that make up a budget. Using the module readings, the Argosy University online library resources, and the Internet, research grant budgets. Based on your research, respond to the following:

• Which element will generally make up the bulk of grant funds you will receive and why (particularly in a grant that is a multi-year award)? Explain your answer with the help of examples.

Give reasons in support of your responses. Be sure to cite any relevant resources.

Write your initial response in approximately 300 words. Apply APA standards to citation of sources.

This analysis asks you to read a chapter from a theologian (Crossan) who is commenting on specific beliefs about doctrines, and respond by critiquing his commentary using what your text book and class discussion have presented. This is an act of critical thinking, because you are required to make connections and draw conclusions that may not be obvious.

Your paper should respond to the following points:

1. Briefly discuss what the article is about (in your own words).

2. Discuss, in your own words, the theological points or themes that you are going to discuss.

3. After reading Crossan, decide what theology from your text best responds to those particular points on which you have focused. Be sure to make reasoned and logical arguments and draw conclusions about why you might take issues with Crossan and why the pieces from the text book can be used to respond.

Your paper should NOT:

· Be a statement of your personal beliefs and/or issues with religion. This is critique and analysis paper – NOT a reflection paper.

· Discuss whether or not you ‘liked’ or ‘disliked’ the article. Build your arguments with facts not personal ‘feelings.’

· Retell the article. I have read each one of them and know the content. I am looking for your analysis, not a retelling.

Other Important Points:

· Be sure to use proper theological terminology when, in your own words, you are explaining the connections you are making.

· Cite, Cite, Cite – plagiarism will result in 0 points and it will be reported.

· Your paper should have a clearly stated introductory paragraph (4-6) sentences, logical sequencing between paragraphs, and a clearly developed conclusion.

· I am willing to go through your paper with you, but you must make an appointment at least a full day before the paper is due.

Paper Specifics:

• Your      papers should be between 500-800 words in length
• Your      papers should be typed, 12pt font and double spaced.
• Your      paper should be submitted in two ways: as a hard copy, given to the instructor in class and online via      TurnItIn. The due date is marked on      the syllabus. Late papers will lose      10 points for each day they are late. After 5 days, the paper will receive 0 points.
• Your      paper should have a clear introduction, clear transitions between paragraphs      and a clear conclusion.

Hurricane Harvey and the Arkema plant in Crosby. After the plant lost power, volatile organic compounds burst into flame, causing an area 1.5 miles around the plant to evacuate. Among the spectacular disasters related to Hurricane Harvey, the fire at the Arkema plant in Crosby stood out.

Discussion Scenario:

As a public safety manager, you have been assigned to review the failed emergency plan (or lack thereof) from the fire at the Arkema plant. Your investigation of the occurrence will come from reading the slide narratives of the event. Your task is to write a summary and list your recommendations based on what you have read; cite disaster responses from what you have learned in this class as a researcher and previous coursework.

 Please use the YouTube link below for this week’s reading/viewing, and discussion board topic. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGz1Vkrwtrc

For this Assignment, 

Build upon your previous work by proposing goals and objectives of a feasible health intervention, project, or

program to address the health behavior components of this health issue.

You will begin this Assignment by providing a summary of the selected health issue and corresponding health behavior theories. 

Outline format 

Provide three goals for the proposed health intervention, project, or program. Each goal should have at least 2–3 objectives. 

Goals and objectives must reflect health behavior at the intrapersonal, interpersonal, or community-based level. 

Goals and objectives must also be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (i.e., SMART goals). 

Conclude this Assignment with a short discussion on possible barriers or challenges to implementing these goals and objectives.