powerpoint-slides-16
hello please make a short powerpoint about the reflection paper you do earlier for me !
thanks
hello please make a short powerpoint about the reflection paper you do earlier for me !
thanks
Scenario
You are the chief prosecutor heading an office with a number of assistant prosecutors, support staff, including paralegals and interns. Your paralegals are well-trained in legal research and in building databases for trials. You have to compile data on cases relating to the death penalty as part of a new tracking program that has been implemented by the state’s attorney general’s office. This is an unfunded mandate that does not provide any additional funds or resources to your office to establish a database. The project requires that you analyze cases prosecuted by your office over the previous 50 years, focusing on issues of racial and economic disparity.
Your assistant prosecutors seem to feel that data collection is mechanical work, fit only for fresh interns. However, you view it as an activity that is too important to delegate to your part-time interns or your paralegals without strong supervision.
Therefore, you decide to assign this duty to two of your senior prosecutors. They will have to devote 50 percent of their time to building the new database and performing the required analysis. You have chosen two prosecutors with the most experience prosecuting capital cases, knowing that they will be most familiar with the data. However, neither prosecutor has a strong background in data collection or computer-based statistical analysis. Both have expressed reservations about overseeing the project.
Support your responses with adequate research and supporting data. Review and comment on the submissions of at least two of your classmates by the end of the week.
Cite any sources using APA format on a separate page.
Individual Assignment
Complete a proposal/charter document for one of the following project topics:
1. Financial Services company – Upgrade software for call phone system for 250 client service employees.
2. Hospital facility – Improve the business process (flow & activities) of discharging 100 patients daily from the outpatient facility.
3. Retail business (merchandise sales) – Open a new location to expand business and service additional customers.
4. Web sales business – Construct new building for physical inventory storage and retrieval.
5. Manufacturing business – Install new high tech equipment for the product bottling (or labeling) function.
6. Other – you may choose a project topic of your own, if it is of medium complexity and scope. It must be as complex as one of the above projects.
The background of the business or organization and the details of the project will be determined by you by using information you know, performing general research, and/or developing the details on your own. All information for the project must be developed by you only for the individual assignments and by you and your team for team assignments. YOU MAY NOT COPY PROJECT INFORMATION from any other sources except if you are substantiating a topic with data or facts.
Remember you not only are describing the project in your charter but justifying it in order to formally authorize completing the project.
Please review PMBOK 4.1.3.1. for Project Charter Output requirements. The project charter must include all 12 elements of the output requirements; project purpose/justification, objectives & success criteria, high level requirements, assumptions & constraints, etc.
Remember to always properly reference. Since this is a project document, you may add a References page at the very end of the document.
Please write an essay 1-2 pages on the of the cradle to cradle methodology.
The following website can be used for consultation
totally15 to 20 slides along with a page of essay which could present with your slides , work cited needed
1.the first slice must be the picture of Boston with a simple description on it. for example, Tokyo city in motion.
2.second slide should be the outline.for example, -introduction:my focus
-evidence:what I will show
-conclusion:what I found
-summary:collage
3. you must use maps to clearly locate the city in its context and identify features that were key to what was to follow
4.for the context, if it is specific are/feature of Boston,its place/relationship to the larger city was clearly explained
5.if comparison used, made a specific point, to help illustrate a larger idea
6.for the conclusion, a strong sense of building up the elements of the presentation, piece by piece ,to arrive at a few clear conclusion.
Describe the “levels of evidence” and provide an example of the type of practice change that could result from each.(minimum 200 words).
you have to write a code for both questions attached in C++.
You have to complete the following programs by writing all functions. DON’T MAKE ANY CHANGES IN THE MAIN
please make sure there are no errors or wrong outputs!! they all should be done as what the worksheet wants you to do it,
After finishing it, please attach each code in a separate txt file and a screenshot of the output
DUE: May 19, 2019 11:55 PM
Grade | N/A |
---|---|
Gradebook Comments | None |
Open Date | May 6, 2019 12:05 AM |
---|---|
Graded? | Yes |
Points Possible | 100.0 |
Resubmissions Allowed? | Yes |
Remaining Submissions | Unlimited |
For your final research paper in this course you will write an analytical research paper addressing a major issue of your choosing from among the topics covered in this course. As a research paper, your paper will have to answer a significant
puzzle related to a course topic. In this week’s assignment, you are expected to identify a paper topic, to outline the puzzle/research question your paper is going to address, and to provide a list of at least 10 academic/peer reviewed sources that you will use in your final paper. All references should be in proper APA format.
Scoring Rubric:
A copy of the complete scoring rubric for this assignment is provided in the Writing Resources module within the course lessons. The following is a synopsis of that rubric.
Area of Evaluation |
Maximum Points |
Focus/Thesis |
20 |
Content/Subject Knowledge |
20 |
Critical Thinking Skills |
20 |
Organization of Ideas/Format |
20 |
Writing Conventions |
20 |
Technical Requirements:
Citations/References: You must use the APA style for this assignment.
Submission: All work is to be submitted as an attachment to the assignment link by 11:55 pm on the due date. All work should be prepared in Microsoft Word format and submitted as an attachment.
DUE: Jun 2, 2019 11:55 PM
Grade | N/A |
---|---|
Gradebook Comments | None |
Open Date | May 6, 2019 12:05 AM |
---|---|
Graded? | Yes |
Points Possible | 100.0 |
Resubmissions Allowed? | No |
Attachments checked for originality? | Yes |
For your final research paper in this course you will write an analytical research paper addressing a major issue of your choosing from among the topics covered in this course. As a research paper, your paper will have to answer a significant puzzle related to a course topic. In the week 2 preliminary assignment, you were to identify a paper topic, outline the puzzle/research question your paper is going to address, and provide a list of at least 10 academic/peer reviewed sources that you will use in your final paper.
For this assignment you are essentially doing the first three elements of your research paper outlined below. The length of this document should range from five (5) to nine (9) pages in length. Be sure to include your reference list and to properly cite sources in APA throughout your paper.
Title Page of the Paper. The title of your paper should be brief but should adequately inform the reader of your general topic and the specific focus of your research. Keywords relating to parameters, population, and other specifics are useful. The Title Page must include the title, name, course name and number, and Professor’s Name.
Introduction, Research Question, and Hypothesis: This section shall provide an overview of the topic that you are writing about, a concise synopsis of the issues, and why the topic presents a “puzzle†that prompts your research questions, which you will include. This section will be 1-2 pages. End your introduction with your research question.
Review of the Literature: All research projects include a literature review to set out for the reader what knowledge exists on the subject under study and helps the researcher develop the research strategy to use in the study. A good literature review is a thoughtful study of what has been written, a summary of the arguments that exist (whether you agree with them or not), arranged thematically. At the end of the summary, there should still be gaps in the literature that you intend to fill with your research. It is written in narrative format and can be from 4-6 pages depending on the scope and length of the paper.
As a literature review, this section should identify the common themes and theories that the prior research identified. In this section, what you do is look at the conclusions of prior research and identify what the common themes are you see in those conclusions. You then identify those themes. The APUS online library has some helpful information on what a literature review is: http://www.apus.edu/apus-library/resources-services/Writing/writing-center/graduate-writing/the-literature-review.html
Scoring Rubric:
A copy of the complete scoring rubric for this assignment is provided in the Writing Resources module within the course lessons. The following is a synopsis of that rubric.
Area of Evaluation |
Maximum Points |
Focus/Thesis |
20 |
Content/Subject Knowledge |
20 |
Critical Thinking Skills |
20 |
Organization of Ideas/Format |
20 |
Writing Conventions |
20 |
Technical Requirements:
Length: 5-9 pages, double spaced, 1″ margins, 12 pitch type in Times New Roman font, left
Citations/References: You must use the APA style for this assignment.
Submission: All work is to be submitted as an attachment to the assignment link by 11:55 pm on the due date. All work should be prepared in Microsoft Word format and submitted as an attachment.
DUE: Jun 16, 2019 11:55 PM
Grade | N/A |
---|---|
Gradebook Comments | None |
Open Date | May 6, 2019 12:05 AM |
---|---|
Graded? | Yes |
Points Possible | 100.0 |
Resubmissions Allowed? | Yes |
Remaining Submissions | Unlimited |
Attachments checked for originality? | Yes |
This assignment is the culmination of your crafting of a research paper on a homeland security issue. In Week Four you presented the first three sections of your paper. This week you add the final sections and present the full paper. Be sure to make any changes to your literature based on instructor feedback.
The three main sections you should add to the paper for this submission are the Methodology and Research Strategy, Analysis and Findings, section and the Conclusions/Recommendations section.
Methodology and Research Strategy: This section provides the reader with a description of how you carried out your qualitative research project, and the variables you identified and analyzed. It describes any special considerations and defines any limitations and terms specific to this project, if necessary. This section can be brief or more complicated, depending on the project, written in 1-2 pages.
Analysis and findings are not the same as conclusions. In the analysis component of this section you identify how you analyzed the data. The second part is the finding you got from your analysis of the data. The findings are the facts that you developed, not your interpretation of the facts. That interpretation is conducted in the conclusions and recommendations section of the paper. Findings will come from the prior research you examined and your analysis of those prior findings to create new findings for your paper. While there may be some facts that are such that they will stand and translate to your paper, the intent is to create new knowledge, so you will normally analyze the data to create your own findings of what facts that data represents, written in 1-2 pages
Conclusions and Recommendations is the section where you give your interpretation of the data. Here you tell the reader what the findings mean. Often the conclusions and recommendations sections will mirror the findings in construct as the researcher tells the reader what that researcher sees as the meaning of that data, their conclusions. Then, drawing on those conclusions, the researcher tells the reader what they believe needs to be done to solve/answer the research question. This section may include recognition of any needs for further research and then finishes with a traditional conclusion to the paper as a whole, written in 1-2 pages
Remember, your paper should seek to answer a question that helps to solve the research puzzle you identified.
Scoring Rubric: A copy of the complete scoring rubric for this assignment is provided in the Writing Resources module within the course lessons. The following is a synopsis of that rubric.
Area of Evaluation |
Maximum Points |
Focus/Thesis |
20 |
Content/Subject Knowledge |
20 |
Critical Thinking Skills |
20 |
Organization of Ideas/Format |
20 |
Writing Conventions |
20 |
Technical Requirements:
Length: Three to six pages (in addition to your literature review), double spaced, 1″ margins, 12 pitch type in Times New Roman font left justified format.
Citations/References: You must use APA style for this assignment.
Submission: All work is to be submitted as an attachment to the assignment link by 11:55 pm on the due date. All work should be prepared in Microsoft Word format and submitted as an attachment.
replies for the two discussion below. (replies should be at least one good paragraph (4-5 sentences). Simply saying you agree with the post or that you like it isn’t considered a substantial contribution.
1) When trying to explain the purpose of Stonehenge we cannot just look at the monument itself but also its surroundings. From there, we can create a hypothesis that if the Stonehenge was of this purpose, then we could find evidence of this on and around the monument. For example, a strong theory is that the Stonehenge was a temple aligned with the movements of the sun. Many religious temples or great building focused on its relationship with the sun (i.e. Egyptian pyramids and Aztec temples). We known that Stonehenge is aligned in astronomically important ways such as Summer Solstice, Vernal Equinox and Winter Solstice. There is also indication that the walls were occupied during midwinter and midsummer, perhaps indicating how the sun rested on the horizon during those times being of ceremonious importance. Final, most times we have found religious sites also being important places to bury the dead and for the afterlife. There are burial sites around Stonehenge that also indicated that people traveled far to come to Stonehenge as well. In the epilogue of Feder’s book, he mentions that “we deserve better- and we can do better. We deserve a veritable past, a real past constructed from the fabric of geology, paleontology, archeology and history woven on the loom of scienceâ€. When we give power to fake or fictitious media to interpret the past, we are losing what it means to be in the present. Our past plays a key role in today and can often guide us in what we should do in the future. Focusing on myths and fables not backed by science distracts people from what really is the past. For instance, many people don’t understand Native American history or they known untrue myths. This helps perpetuate an untrue stereotypes about Native Americans based on lack of education about the sophistication and complexity of all the different Native American tribes and cultures. We deserve to give the past respect by scientifically deriving the true events in history, not the most fanciful or imaginative ones.
2)The reason behind the collapse of the Mayan civilization seems to be a movement of things. It wasn’t just one thing that wiped the Mayans out, or caused them to leave behind their cities. It seemed to start population growth. As the population grew, the demand for water and food grew. However, drought started occurring causing the water and crops to start to deteriorate. When the food and water start to run out they start to leave. I also believe that war was a cause of it, but I think the water and food are a bit more important.
I was once told that the best way to find answers or find out if something is true is to try to disprove it, even if you believe it. I think that’s the best way to explain to people that believe in the non-scientific things. Best if they start looking into ways that disprove their belief and find none then they can believe that it is true. But it also makes them have to look into other evidence to disprove if that evidence is accurate or not.
Reflection essay: Comparison between Böröcz’s and Zielonka’s visions of the EU as empire.
– József Böröcz, “Empire and Coloniality in the ‘Eastern Enlargement’ of the European Unionâ€, in: József Böröcz and Melinda Kovács (eds), Empire’s New Clothes. Unveiling EU Enlargement (Central Europe Review, 2001).
– Jan Zielonka, “Europe as a Global Actor: Empire by Example?â€, International Affairs, 84, 3 (2008).
Length of essay – 4-5 standard pages (1 standard page = 1800 characters).