Discuss in 500 words, why institutions are reluctant to move their IT to the cloud. Consider specific industries like education, medicine, military, etc. Use 2 scholarly references in APA style.

Case and Discussion: Headache

A 35-year-old woman comes to your office to discuss her “bad headaches,” which started after having her first child 2 years ago. The headaches sometimes awaken her from sleep and at times can be disabling and occasionally require her to take Tylenol and rest in a dark room. Sometimes she vomits during an attack. Over the past 6 months, her headaches have become more severe and frequent, prompting her visit today.

• What additional questions would you ask to learn more about her headaches?
• How do you classify headaches?
• How can you determine if this is an old headache or a new headache/s? Is this a chronic or episodic condition?
• Can you make a definite diagnosis through an open-ended history followed by focused questions?
• How can you use the patient history to distinguish between benign headaches and serious ones that require urgent attention?
• What diagnostic tests do you want to include to help you with your diagnosis?
• Create a differential diagnosis flow sheet for this patient for this patient and include the diagnostics related to the differentials.

When responding to posts of other learners, please ensure that those responses are substantive. Add to the discussion, offer examples, rather than posting an “I agree” statement. Tell why you agree. Augment your thinking to the critical level. Ask any questions that will help you better understand each post. Make suggestions that will provide food for thought.

Student post down below:

Discussing leadership within organizations, and those leaders that I worked with, and under as a subordinate, is a subject that has many experiences, both positive and negative that can be told. Suffice it to say that the negatives were learning challenges that taught what not to do, and the positive formed a leadership style that works for a human service organization.

It is true that service as a concept in a for-profit organization is important, but the major focus in on delivery of a product and making sure that the customer/consumer will return and provide positive feedback. A non-profit only has service to sell and their role has to be focused on providing needed services and their customer may be clients as individuals or communities as well as organizations. The missions of each type of organizations may also be quite different as making a profit is not the core value of a non-profit.

Having worked in a for-profit organization for over thirty years, I found that most of the leaders tended to be of the behavioral school. They were selected by known and displayed corporate leadership skills. They worked to get things done and their relationship with their subordinates was one of authority. There was no doubt as to who/whom was in charge. Many followed corporate policy to the letter and their focus was on getting ahead. Climbing the corporate ladder was their focus. During this time the company focus was on downsizing and perhaps it would have been difficult for a transformational leader to function. Becoming focused on staff that you may have to downsize would not have been comfortable.

Needless to say, over a five- year period many persons, some with over 30 years of service exited, not willingly as jobs went to India or were eliminated. Doing this to another person is not for the faint of heart no matter how much one believed in a company’s vision. Working within this environment did not serve one well and it was almost a blessing/relief to be given the door. Behavioral leaders, as existing within the workplace, did not appreciate someone who believed in the concept of transformational theories. It is my understanding that not much has changed since leaving, and many persons, who were not asked to leave, chose to seek employment elsewhere or retire willingly. While a stressful and negative environment, there was also a learning experience. What to do and how to treat others, the value of building professional relationships with staff was a lesson well learned and a respected one. The leadership style and values attributed to a human service leader are those that can provide positive results and staff success.

When responding to posts of other learners, please ensure that those responses are substantive. Add to the discussion, offer examples, rather than posting an “I agree” statement. Tell why you agree. Augment your thinking to the critical level. Ask any questions that will help you better understand each post. Make suggestions that will provide food for thought.

Student paper down below:

Behavior theories appears to fit me the best from what I read in the literature. I am always excited to eager to learn from others regardless of their status. In knowing that one is capable of learning from anyone else, including their clients, a person will naturally grow as they continue to move through the process. It is stated that “Behavior theories opened doors to the idea that certain behaviors and skill leaders used can be identified, observed, and learned” (Harley-McClaskey, 2015). As it is always important to take the time to learn from others, it is also important to remember that others will be learning from you as well, with that being said, making sure one is patient with their followers who are also eager to learn as well. This is where I feel as if I identify from this literature. I have not had a lot of experience leading in the work place outside of client work, so I am not sure how it would actually be in a staffing situation. However, I am excited to get to this point and learn as I go. I do find myself taking the time to learn from my leaders, which I have found all of which have different strenghts to offer. This to me is where true learning occurs. I have found that I observe and take in information like a sponge on any therapeutic approach. This has allowed me to find myself being able to take different approaches with different clients as needed.

Study Guide

• For the empirical studies: be able to explain, with specific details, the experimental manipulation (this will be the instructions/materials the participants received) for each study (there may be more than one in each article).
• Be able to explain what those studies found (what were the “results”—may be clearer in the discussion) – again, being specific (ex: don’t just say they were less biased, say what they were less biased about).
• Be able to explain specific research findings for the color blind and multicultural approaches (what differences did research find in people’s behavior/what works and what problems arise)?
• What are the sources of antidiscrimination law (hint: the article identifies five)?Can you give an example of a specific law or act?
• What are the two “forms of justice” and how do they differ, according to the reading?
• Be able to explain illusions/biases associated with the two heuristics from the cognition reading.
• Be able to explain the threat-based approach to prejudice model (the threat, the cue, etc.)
• Be able to discuss what the Rushton article claims and what kind of evidence it uses.