these are 2 assignments assignment 3 should be 1 page assignment 4 3 pages no plagiarism no grammar typos top quality work required

These are 2 Assignments, Assignment 3 should be 1 page, Assignment 4, 3 pages. No plagiarism no grammar typos. Top quality work required

Note follow instructions carefully.

RE; Assignment 3 Teaching Philosophy or Frame of Facilitation

Please see assignments info.

This assignment is intended to you encourage you to create A LIVING DOCUMENT that will guide you in your daily decision making, giving you a set of principles that can help you decide what you want to do, how you want to act, and what you will prioritise. You can return to this LIVING DOCUMENT throughout your career and revise as required.



A key competency identified by the International Association of Facilitators is for facilitators to practice self-assessment and self-awareness. This requires practitioners to:

• Reflect on behaviour and results
• Maintain congruence between actions and personal and professional values
• Modify personal behaviour / style to reflect the needs of the group
• Cultivate understanding of one’s own values and their potential impact on work with clients

Describe your Frame of Facilitation (See Figure 1.2, p. 14 and Chapter 17, p. 439)



or Philosophy of Teaching (the Teaching Practices Inventory
http://teachingperspectives.com/ may be helpful)



You may find it helpful to review the different competency models to prepare a reflective statement or graphic illustration which includes:

• What you value: statement of values and beliefs about facilitating adult learning
• What you do: your model of facilitation (roles as a facilitator (see p. 14), how you use power, statement of commitment to personal growth etc).

You will share your frame of facilitation with your peers on the Discussion Board in our final week. You may present this as a one page written statement or a graphic illustration or in an audio/visual format. Please also upload your completed assignment to the Dropbox.



Evaluation: This assessment is graded out of 16 points and will be evaluated using the following rubric.






Learners may receive partial scores or a zero for unacceptable work.

Criteria	Does Not Meet Expectations 1	Partially Meets Expectations 2	Meets Expectations 3	Exceeds Expectations 4	Max Points
Depth of Reflection	Response demonstrates a lack of reflection. Viewpoints and interpretations are missing, inappropriate, and/or unsupported. Examples, when applicable, are not provided.	Response demonstrates minimal reflection. Viewpoints and interpretations are partially supported or supported with flawed arguments. Examples, when applicable, are not provided or partially relevant to the assignment.	Response demonstrates a thoughtful reflection. Viewpoints and interpretations are supported. Appropriate examples are provided, as applicable.	Response demonstrates an in-depth reflection. Viewpoints and interpretations are insightful and well supported. Clear, detailed examples are provided, as applicable.	4
Required Components	Response is missing/does not address required components indicated in the instructions.	Response is missing/does not address some of the required components indicated in the instructions.	Response includes all components and meets the requirements indicated in the instructions.	Response includes and exceeds the requirements indicated in the instructions.	4
Quality of Analysis	Inadequate comprehension of concepts or theories presented in course materials. Includes irrelevant external resources and/or few or no course materials	Partial comprehension of concepts or theories presented in course materials. Includes course materials and external resources with limited relevance.	Adequate comprehension of concepts or theories presented in course materials. Includes course materials and relevant external resources.	Broad and in-depth comprehension of concepts or theories presented in course materials and relevant external resources.	4
Writing	Unclear organization. Many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors.	Some signs of logical organization. A few grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors.	Organization supports purpose. Well-constructed paragraphs. Almost no grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors.	Organization fully and imaginatively supports purpose. Well-constructed paragraphs and subheadings. No grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors.

Assignment 4: Reflective Practice Journal

Please assignment

The aim of this assignment is to encourage reflective practice. This paper is for YOU (not me) to create A LIVING DOCUMENT that will encourage you to engage in reflective practice throughout your career.

Following the guidelines and insights of Chapter 7, “Creative and reflective journal processes” AND Chapter 17, “Ongoing learning and maintenance”. The journal can include phrases, passages, words, quotes, sayings, dialogues, drawings, doodling, sketches, scribbles, cartoons, collage, mind maps, mandalas, prose and poetry, graphs and charts, colours, images and symbols.” (Hogan, 2003, p. 134)

During Week 9 or 10, review your journal entries. Prepare a 3-5 page summary of key insights which may include: ‘content’ knowledge/observations, ‘process’ knowledge/observations, observations of group behaviour, applications to problems you are trying to solve, uses of journal writing in your practice, self-assessment of where you are on the appropriate competency model, future learning goals.

Evaluation

This assessment is graded out of 16 points and will be evaluated using the following rubric.

Learners may receive partial scores or a zero for unacceptable work.

Criteria	Does Not Meet Expectations 1	Partially Meets Expectations 2	Meets Expectations 3	Exceeds Expectations 4	Max Points
Quality of Reflection	Inadequate comprehension of concepts or theories presented in course materials. Includes irrelevant external resources and/or few or no course materials	Partial comprehension of concepts or theories presented in course materials. Includes course materials and external resources with limited relevance.	Adequate comprehension of concepts or theories presented in course materials. Includes course materials and relevant external resources.	Broad and in-depth comprehension of concepts or theories presented in course materials and relevant external resources.	4
Required Components	Response is missing/does not address required components indicated in the instructions.	Response is missing/does not address some of the required components indicated in the instructions.	Response includes all components and meets the requirements indicated in the instructions.	Response includes and exceeds the requirements indicated in the instructions.	4
Support for Ideas	Offers simplistic or little support for ideas. Ideas are irrelevant to course. Connections between ideas are unclear.	Ideas are partially supported/relevant, too broad, or repetitive. Includes some examples. Inconsistent connections between ideas.	Ideas are supported by appropriate examples that lead to logical conclusions. Consistent connections between ideas.	Substantial and logical development of new ideas and insights. Conclusions are original, compelling, and topical.	4
Writing	Unclear organization. Many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors.	Some signs of logical organization. A few grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors.	Organization supports purpose. Well-constructed paragraphs. Almost no grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors.	Organization fully and imaginatively supports purpose. Well-constructed paragraphs. No grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors.	4

Please make reference from the assign chapters.

Thanks