write a critical reading response based on article quot america s dirty work migrant maids and modern day slavery quot

by

In approximately 400 words, critically respond to “America’s Dirty Work: Migrant Maids and Modern-Day Slavery” by Joy M. Zarembka. Pay special attention to the structure of this essay as an advocacy piece. The essay is divided into five parts, the introduction, subheading “Global Mothers,” subheading “Patterns,” subheading “A Comparison,” and the conclusion “Solutions.” Briefly analyze the function of each of these parts and the type of evidence used in each to advance the overall argument, but focus the bulk of you attention to the last section, “Solutions.”

In the prompt for your advocacy paper, you are asked to make a decision to become an advocate for solutions to your central problem in at least one of the following three ways: 1) advocate for one or more specific solutions to the significant and current political/social/cultural problem that sits at the center of your focus; 2) locate the next steps to potentially solving your project’s central problem; or, 3) argue for why the current solutions do not work and leave your readers with questions about possible next steps. Does Zarembka, in her “Solutions” section, advocate for a specific solution(s), suggest not a solution but a next step towards solution, or simply criticize the current state of the problem and allow readers to find their own solutions? Is her choice effective or in need of further development?

I upload the reading below