self inventory of information literacy

by

Instructions

  • Review the Nursing Competencies related to Information and Computer Literacy.
  • Assess your information and computer literacy skills and identify areas for learning and write a 1-2 page reflection of your own assessment of your literacy skills and areas for learning.
  • Select three areas for skills improvement and create a learning plan for how you can obtain the knowledge and skills to advance your competencies.

Computer Literacy Example: If you do not know how to create a spreadsheet, what resources could help you learn this skill? What is your target for accomplishing this goal?

Information Literacy Example: If you struggle with developing a searchable question or statement, then planning and implementing the search, what resources could help you learn this skill?

Learning Plan

Learner Objectives

(SMART Goal)

Resources to accomplish the goal

(with citation)

Time Frame

(target for accomplishing this goal)

Rubric

NU225 Unit 2 Assignment – Self Inventory of Information Literacy

NU225 Unit 2 Assignment – Self Inventory of Information Literacy
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContentNU225-CO1; NU225-CO2; NU225-CO4; NU225-CO5
50.0 pts

Level 5

Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.

 45.0 pts

Level 4

Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.

 40.0 pts

Level 3

Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.

 35.0 pts

Level 2

Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.

 30.0 pts

Level 1

Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual factors but does not provide a defined statement.

 0.0 pts

Level 0

There is no evidence of a defined statement.

50.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisNU225-CO1; NU225-CO2; NU225-CO4; NU225-CO5
50.0 pts

Level 5

Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

 45.0 pts

Level 4

Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

 40.0 pts

Level 3

Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

 35.0 pts

Level 2

Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.

 30.0 pts

Level 1

Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.

 0.0 pts

Level 0

Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.

50.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
40.0 pts

Level 5

The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

 34.67 pts

Level 4

The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.

 29.33 pts

Level 3

The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.

 24.0 pts

Level 2

The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

 18.67 pts

Level 1

The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

 0.0 pts

Level 0

The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty in discerning the meaning.

40.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I
10.0 pts

Level 5

The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.

 9.0 pts

Level 4

The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

 8.0 pts

Level 3

The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

 7.0 pts

Level 2

The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

 6.0 pts

Level 1

Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate a limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.

 0.0 pts

Level 0

There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references.

10.0 pts

Total Points: 150.0

Next